GEICO Reviews (%countItem)
View Photos
GEICO Rating
Address: 5260 Western Ave, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Fax: |
+1 (301) 986-2851 |
Web: |
www.geicoinsurance.com
|
E-mails: |
Sign in to see
|
Add contact information for GEICO
Add new contacts
ADVERTISEMENT
I'd give 0 stars at this point. Filed a glass claim last week, as snow and cold temps cracked son's windshield (2017 Chevy Camaro - 50th Anniversary Edition). Selected a lot glass company to do the work and even called them as soon as it was scheduled to request FACTORY glass. NO ONE at Geico advised we were only being allowed to receive AFTERMARKET parts. We had the car done yesterday and even service company never commented until we picked up that it was not FACTORY glass as we requested. BEYOND livid. Geico said "it's just a logo" that is different. However, that logo means a lot when we want to sell that anniversary edition vehicle. Also, found out today that if we are in an accident, our NEW CARS will only receive AFTERMARKET parts as well. We are paying an arm & a leg a month for insurance to get crap parts when we have a claim. Taking quotes for new coverage starting today!
no comment
I signed up in September and paid my bill in full on the 25th. 2 months later, I get a bill for another $40.70. Not a lot of money, I get it. But I PAID IN FULL. I called to ask what it was for, since the bill tells nothing. I got put on hold and transfered to a number that wasnt' valid and hung up on. I called back later and got a hold of a nice lady who was helpful and was able to determine this charge was because I was rear ended back in Aug 2014 (not my fault, geico covered the accident under the other person's policy as it was their fault). You had every opportunity to look into this before I switched to Geico. You can't just send me a random bill later on with no explanation and ask for more money. This is bait and switch. Quote me one price, charge me said price and than ask for more money. Not a chance. You had all my info prior to starting my policy, you ran my MVR, my credit, everything. You can't come to me and expect me to pay you now. I will not. YOu are already more money than my previous company. Wish I would have just stuck with them.
December 20, 2018
Revdex.com of Metropolitan Washington DC
and Eastern Pennsylvania
1411 K St. NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005-3404
Attention: ***
Re: *** Case ID: *** Policy#: ***
Dear ***
This will acknowledge receipt of your December 17, 2018 inquiry regarding the above referenced private passenger automobile insurance policy.
On September 28, 2018, the above policy was established in the name of *** to insure a 2017 ***. Our records show that the insured was initially quoted a six-month premium of $415.80 based on a policy placement in our preferred company, GEICO General Insurance Company. *** indicated on his policy application that he did not have any accidents or traffic convictions within the past five years. However, upon reviewing the driving history reflected on his prior GEICO policy, it indicated that the insured was involved in a not-at-fault accident on August 22, 2014. The policy application was then re-evaluated to include this occurrence, which resulted in a new policy placement and a revised six-month premium of $456.50.
It is GEICO’s position that the change in policy placement and the resulting increase in premium were due to the evaluation of a previously undisclosed occurrence for the insured. However, our company has decided to make an exception to honor the initial policy placement and the associated premium of $415.80 per six months. The policy has been adjusted accordingly, and updated policy paperwork will be sent to the insured reflecting the adjustment. The policy is currently paid in full.
Since there appears to be no valid complaint against GEICO, we ask that this be removed from our record.
If you require further assistance with this matter, please contact the undersigned at .
Sincerely,
Brian O Executive Office
[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me. I do still say that it is their fault as they ran my mvr before issuing policy.
Regards
I have been with this insurance company for 9 years now and they have always been so great to work with! They help everytime I call and are always so friendly. I am proud to call them my insurance company. When I was in my first accident they made the whole process so easy and got me into a rental within the next business day.
I actually had a pretty good experience with Geico.
I purchased auto insurance with Geico in FL and payed a pretty penny: $256/month to cover my new 2017 Fiat 500C, purchased in Sept 2017. It was the most extensive auto insurance, covering myself and other vehicle up to $100,000, injuries and even missed work salary. It was so expensive, but I'm glad I kept it because of my total loss accident.
Geico was extremely responsive and communicative throughout the whole accident process. My app was updated daily and Geico paid out my financing company promptly.
However, I think my cars assessed value was kind of a scam. It was brand new and Geico valued it $12,000 less than I would still owe my financing company, WITHOUT a replacement car. Thank god I purchased Gap insurance as well, otherwise I would have been in the hole $12,000 and without a car. Geico provided a rental for just one week. Not sure how they expect most folks to buy a new car within one week of a total loss accident. Crazy.
If people get headaches from insurance policies, it's probably because they bought a cheap kind with all sorts of provisions on what is covered or not. No one wants to pay a lot, but when the day comes that your car or another is hit, you'll be glad you did. Consider it an investment.
No Comment
Raised homeowners insurance from 1000.00 a year to 4600.00 at year on a 60000.00 house. No claims, not in a flood zone, no explanation. Since this is done thru an escrow account with the bank the house payment went up 1000.00 per month since there was no warning and it go behind, They should be investigated and made to provide explanations for increases of this size. I was told it was legal in Ohio with the passage of some bill. Just because its legal doen't mean its ethical.
no comment
GEICO mailed me an application for an auto insurance quote (they don't let you do it online anymore for Michigan). The application says to return the app back to them in the enclosed envelope. None was enclosed. I e-mailed GEICO's CEO about it but received no response.
no comment
On December 8 2018 we were taking our daughter our for her birthday in which turned into a night of horror. The axle on the back of the vehicle broke so I called geico and told them what was going on. After waiting for two hours for them to dispatch a tow truck we are told by a manger from geico that enterprise cannot pick us up. Mind you we are in shipshewana indiana in which is omish town. After telling them that they tell us that we are stranded for the most part. Mind you its 30 degrees outside and 5 children in which my wife is 8 months pregnant and high risk due to gestational diabetes. After telling the manager that she tells us there is noth in ng she can do. We are 30 miles away from the enterprise dealer. Mind you they asked if the tow company can't take me there and I get told no. So with 30 degree weather and 5 children ranging from 4 to 13 we are told to contact the police department really yes. Well after I get told no by the police department I tell geico this all they can tell me is that they cannot help at all. So we have to walk 30 miles to get there. We were so lucky that a family picked us up and took us there. If not and my wife would have been in pre term labor or one of the kids caught hypothermia I can guarantee there would have been a lawsuit. When I get my vehicle back I will guarantee I will no longer use geico ever again especially after how me and my family got treated is total disgusting and disrespectful it makes me want to vomit. I served in the marine corps for 12 years and three tours to Iraq and having been doing business with geico for a long time and this is how I get treated no thank you my family deserves better than this. Not that it should matter but this is completely disrespectful and disgusting left on the side of the road in 30 degree weather with 5 children and a pregnant wife and told there is no option but to walk.
No Comment
failure to respond of pay out claim do not ever use geico
I have been a customer with Geico since 2012 and have never had any issues until recently. I have my account set up to be automatically withdrawn from my account every month. I postponed it this month for lack of funds. I called Geico on 12/3 and spoked with an agent named Kelly to switch my account information. They neglected to tell me that in doing so I would not prevent my account from still being withdrawn even when they got the payment from my account. Now they keep trying to pull a payment from an account they no longer have access to. I called 12/7 and spoke with In a a supervisor to explain what happened and she was not helpful and very rude in explaining the situation. I have proof from my bank account that they were trying to pull a payment after receiving it for the month. My bank could see pending payments when I called them that they had to stop themselves and would have costed me more money to do but they were nice enough to waive the fee. So even with them removing my account as they claimed they did they were still trying to get payments from that account that was removed and even my bank could see them still wanting to take it 4-5 days after my payment processed.
December 17, 2018
Dear ***:This will acknowledge receipt
of your request regarding the above named insured’s private passenger
automobile policy. In ***’s correspondence
to your organization she expresses concern that GEICO attempted to withdraw a
payment from her bank account that she called and removed resulting in the
charging of overdraft fees from her financial institution. She has requested a refund of the overdraft
fees in the amount of $64.00. GEICO’s records show that the
policy in question is enrolled in GEICO’s monthly automatic payment plan per
request of *** with payments scheduled to be deducted on the 24th of every month. Please note that GEICO
needs a minimum of three business days in order to stop a scheduled payment.
This is advised to the customer upon enrollment in automatic payments.On November 16, 2018, *** requested to postpone her November 24, 2018 payment of $218.59 to
December 3, 2018. Per her request, the
payment was postponed to December 3, 2018.*** contacted GEICO
on December 3, 2018 and requested to change the bank account information used
to withdraw her monthly installments. At
the time of her request, the payment of $218.59 was already “in flight” to ***’s financial institution to be extracted that day. Once a payment is “in flight” it cannot be
stopped. The bank account information
for the automatic payments was updated per her request but for her future installments. In addition to the change she made with the
account used for automatic payments, she also requested to make a payment in
the amount of $218.59, using the new bank account information. The payment was processed as she requested.On December 4, 2018, GEICO
was notified by ***’s financial institution that the automatic
payment processed on December 3, 2018 had been declined. It is GEICO’s standard practice to make two
attempts to extract a payment as long as the financial institution allows us
to. This second attempt cannot be
stopped. A second attempt to process the payment was made on the same day. On December 11, 2018, GEICO
was notified by ***’s financial institution that our second attempt
had been unsuccessful. As a result a $20.00 returned payment fee was charged to
the policy. On December 12, 2018, a
decision was made by GEICO’s Management Team to waive the $20.00 returned
payment fee as a matter of excellent customer service.
It is GEICO’s position that
all proper procedures were followed in the handling of ***’s policy.
Unfortunately, GEICO was not provided with enough notice to stop the scheduled
payment from being extracted on December 3, 2018. We maintain that no further credits/refunds
are owed.If you have any questions, or
if GEICO can be of any further service in this matter, please contact Barbara
F* at .Sincerely,Timothy L.Assistant Vice President of
Underwriting
GEICO decided to drop me without telling me after I was rear ended by another driver. They raised my premiums by at least 5% a year even though I have no tickets or accidents. They still have not told me why they have dropped me...
No Comment
My vehicle was involved in an accident, and it needed to be repaired. Geico was not honest about the market value of my vehicle, because if they were, my vehicle would have met the 80% threshold in which Geico would have had to repair the vehicle. Therefore, Geico alleged that the market value of my vehicle was less than what it really was. Therefore, I had to get my own appraiser and we had to go to arbitration. The arbitrator stated that my car was worth more than the value that Geico alleged it was worth. Based on the arbitrator's decision, the market value of my vehicle would have met the 80% threshold in which Geico would have had to repair my vehicle. After I got my own appraiser, Gecio had to get an appraiser as well. During this time, Gecio sent me a check for my vehicle; however Rick the adjuster, and his boss, Spencer H, told me not to cash the check until Geico's appraiser made his determination about the value of my vehicle, and if his determination was not in accord with my appraiser's determination, Rick and Spencer told me not to cash the check until the arbitrator made the final determination about the value of my vehicle. During this time I was in a rental car. Rick and Spencer gave me a verbal authorization to extend the duration of the renal vehicle because they told me not to cash the check, and not to have my car repaired. Now, Geico is saying that they will only pay $1050 of the rental charges, and I have to pay the other $700. This is not fair because Rick and Spencer gave me a verbal authorization to extend the rental and because Rick and Spencer told me not to have my car repaired until after the arbitrator made the final determination about the value of my vehicle.
Dear ***:
Thank you for your recent inquiry. We appreciate the opportunity to address ***'s concerns.
We elected to handle the claim for ***'s total loss vehicle by compensating him for the actual cash value of his vehicle rather than compensating him for the cost to repair the vehicle. The decision was made not withstanding any later adjustments to the vehicle’s actual cash value within the provisions of the policy contract. The actual cash value was determined by using real market data in compliance with Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 2695.8. We stand by the accuracy of the valuation we provided to *** and believe it to be a fair representation of the vehicle’s actual cash value.
On April 18, 2018, we sent a letter to *** outlining our position regarding the value of the vehicle and issued payment for the undisputed settlement amount at that time. The letter included the following statements:
“Cashing the check will not compromise any future claims you make with respect to the physical damage coverage" and "Your rental will not be authorized past April 18, 2018.”
*** elected to invoke the appraisal clause in the policy on April 20, 2018, and we discussed the timeline of the appraisal process with him at that time. We advised *** that we would pay for his rental costs up to the limit of the rental reimbursement coverage on the policy, which is $1,050.00.
We sincerely apologize if this claim was not handled to ***'s satisfaction; however, it is our position that we have fulfilled our obligations to *** under the terms of his policy. We are continually modifying and refining the claims process in an effort to exceed our customers' expectations.
If you have any questions, please contact Kyle S, Auto Damage Manager at .
Dear ***:
Thank you for your recent inquiry. We appreciate the opportunity to address ***'s concerns.
The 80% threshold *** mentions in his inquiry is a specific guideline we use to help our adjusters make the decision as whether to pay for the repair of a vehicle or pay for the vehicle's actual cash value. It is not an industry requirement to total a vehicle if it exceeds the 80% threshold, and alternatively, it is not an industry requirement to consider a vehicle repairable if it does not meet the 80% threshold. As the insurer, the decision to pay for the repair of a vehicle or pay for the actual cash value is solely at our discretion, as is outlined in the policy contract. In this case, we made the decision to compensate *** for the actual cash value of his vehicle, which we have done in accordance with Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 2695.8.
While *** states that he did not receive our letter dated April 18, 2018, our file does indicate that the letter was mailed to the verified address that we have on file for ***. Also, our file does not have any documentation indicating that we advised *** not to cash the total loss settlement check or that we agreed to pay in excess of the $1,050.00 limit of the rental reimbursement coverage on the policy. Our file documentation does show that our Auto Damage Supervisor advised *** that we would compensate him for rental costs up to the policy limit while we proceeded with the independent appraisal process outlined in the policy contract.
If you have any further questions, please contact Kyle S, Auto Damage Manager, at .
Sincerely,
J. Lee M, Jr.
Assistant Vice President, Claims
Tell us why here...
[To assist us in bringing this matter to a close, you must give us a reason why you are rejecting the response. If no reason is received your complaint will be closed as Answered]
Complaint: ***
I am rejecting this response because:
Geico's response about the 80% threshold being irrelevant defies logic. According to Geico's logic (or lack thereof), if somebody had $500.00 worth of damage to their $20,000.00 vehicle, Geico could decide to declare the vehicle a total loss and pay the owner $20,000.00 for the vehicle instead of paying $500.00 to fix the vehicle. That make no sense at all. My vehicle was valued at $12,900, and therefore, it met the 80% threshold for it to be repaired. Geico lied about the true value of vehicle so they would not have to repair it.
Furthermore, When I spoke to the Auto Damage Supervisor, Spencer H, he told me that Geico would pay for my rental car for the entire time I was in the rental up until the arbitrator made a final decision regarding the value of my vehicle, which did not occur until June 18, 1018. Spencer H NEVER said that Geico would only pay the rental up to the policy limit. That is why Geico could not produce that in writing. Geico needs to stop lying!
Regards
To whom it may concern,
I ***, paid $54.00 to *** (Collection Agency) in August of 2018 to settle my bill with Geico (Insurance Agency). Recently, I have inquired about a new quote with Geico and they said that the bill has not paid in full and I still owe a significant amount.
The agency *** has confirmed the amount is paid in full and my account has been closed on their end. However, Geico representatives refuse to acknowledge this and refuse to contact *** for clarification.
December 7, 2018
Revdex.com of Metropolitan Washington DC
and Eastern Pennsylvania
1411 K St. NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005-3404
Attention: ***
Re: ***
Case ID: *** Policy#: ***
Dear ***:
This will acknowledge receipt of your December 5, 2018 inquiry regarding the above referenced private passenger automobile insurance policy.
Since receiving ***’s inquiry, we have confirmed with *** that *** has made the settlement in full and agree that *** does not owe GEICO any premium at this time. We have removed the outstanding earned premium balance in the amount of $54.48 from the above policy.
We would like to express our apologies to *** for any inconvenience that this matter may have caused, and regret the dissatisfactory service he received regarding his request to apply for a new GEICO policy, as this is not indicative of the usual quality of service our company provides. *** is welcome to contact GEICO’s Sales Department for a new policy quote.
Since there appears to be no valid complaint against GEICO, we ask that this be removed from our record.
If you require further assistance with this matter, please contact the undersigned at .
Sincerely,
Maria O
Executive Office
December 7, 2018
Revdex.com of Metropolitan Washington DC
and Eastern Pennsylvania
1411 K St. NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005-3404
Attention: ***
Re: ***
Case ID: *** Policy#: ***
Dear ***:
This will acknowledge receipt of your December 5, 2018 inquiry regarding the above referenced private passenger automobile insurance policy.
Since receiving Mr. Everett’s inquiry, we have confirmed with *** that *** has made the settlement in full and agree that *** does not owe GEICO any premium at this time. We have removed the outstanding earned premium balance in the amount of $54.48 from the above policy.
We would like to express our apologies to *** for any inconvenience that this matter may have caused, and regret the dissatisfactory service he received regarding his request to apply for a new GEICO policy, as this is not indicative of the usual quality of service our company provides. *** is welcome to contact GEICO’s Sales Department for a new policy quote.
Since there appears to be no valid complaint against GEICO, we ask that this be removed from our record.
If you require further assistance with this matter, please contact the undersigned at .
Sincerely,
Maria O
Executive Office
Got a policy with GEICO to cover my new car on 11/16/18. I paid $140.32 to get the policy for myself as a driver, and had to list my husband as a non driver. The policy was granted but on 11/28 I received an email stating my policy was cancelled and to contact GEICO. I was told by GEICO that since my husband has a license he had to be covered, not true. He doesn't have to be covered, but an exclusion affidavit stating he would not be operating the car must be submitted (per Ohio BMV's website). Also, his license were suspended in 2007, have since expired, AND were negated entirely when he was issued his NON DRIVER state id card. Stating that they could not provide coverage due to this issue, they cancelled the policy, to be effective 12/11/2018 so they wouldn't have to give a refund. When I asked for a FULL refund, GEICO stated that no refund would be issued, since they would have provided coverage from 11/16-12/11. Cancelling because they can't provide the coverage, but not refunding because they did provide the coverage. Not offering or informing me of the exclusion clause violates Ohio law, and providing coverage that they themselves say they cannot provide violates their own policy. So I then demanded they cancel the policy immediately on 11/28/18 and, since no claims were submitted and they cannot possibly provide the coverage that the money was for, a full refund of the $140.32. Instead they offered a measly $54.03 refund because they provided coverage from 11/16-11/28. This also raises questions for me. How is the first 12 days of the policy worth $86.29, but the remaining 18 days of the policy only worth 54.03? The way I figure it, each day should be equal in cost/value, and in this case would be about $4.68/day. So I should be due AT LEAST $84.19 for the remaining 18 days that I paid for but will not be covered for now. I feel the company has found a way to put a professional look on strong armed robbery.
Please contact Joy K at or email ***@geico.com if you have further questions.
[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me. However, I find it a little strange and ineffective to offer the exclusion affidavit ONLY to policy holder's that have had the policy for 90 days or more. Do me and my spouse have to be separated and live apart for 90 days in order for him to eventually be excluded from coverage. This seems to be a terrible policy, as it negates the intended benefit of the affidavit itself. But I have received the refund, and though it wasn't the full amount I paid, I'll take what I can get. I will NEVER use GEICO for any service in the future for fear of underlying "loopholes and stipulations" that may be lurking in their policies. Thank you for your kind assistance in this matter
Regards
I will be changing to a less expensive company as soon as I locate one. Once a car hit my parked car and I PAID out of pocket a huge deductible to get the mirror fixed. The other incident I had was me getting rear-ended on the freeway. I feel like I am being punished for things that were out of my control and that's why this lying as company stinks! They told me my rates would go down for good driving and my rates have NEVER gone down over the past 10 years...even prior to me having those two recent events. (within 3 years) I will certainly switch to a less expensive insurance and one who honors their promises.
This is the lie they tell but they NEVER honored it for me in the past 10 years or more.
"Offering a variety of discounts, including vehicle equipment, driving history and habits, and customer loyalty."
no comment
I have homeowners and auto insurance with GEICO. When I got my quote on the house last year I gave them all the information over the phone for the quote. I took the insurance at that amount, but realized that they had the square footage wrong. That cost me more money to correct. Now I noticed that they only have a 2 car garage covered I have 3. That increased the premium again.
Either they are incompetent or playing a game to have lower premium quotes.
no comment
October 20th I was involved in a auto accident, where a girl did not yield to a yellow left hand turning signal and hit me as I was going straight through the light which had just turned yellow as I entered it. We both have Geico Insurance. They had both of us at no fault, trying to get us to file on our own policy's. I would not since I was clearly at no fault. Now they have it at 80% her and I would have to pay the other 20% out of pocket. I refuse to do that. They have lied to me several times and have not even looked at my *** which is totaled. I live alone and have no transportation since I could not get a rental car unless I filed on my policy. Thank you
November 26, 2018
Revdex.com Serving Metro Washington DC & Eastern Pennsylvania
ATTN: ***
1411 K St. NW, 10th Floor
Washington DC 20005-3404
RE: File Number: ***
Dear ***,
We received your correspondence dated November 19, 2018. We have not included any personal identifying information on our response, as you requested.
This complaint arises out of an automobile accident which occurred on October 20, 2018. On October 22, 2018, we obtained the complainant recorded statement at which time she reported that she was traveling eastbound on *** Highway. She indicated the light changed from green to yellow as she entered the intersection driving her ***. The complainant stated she noticed a *** approaching the intersection; however, she believed she had time to travel to the opposite side of the intersection before they approached. The complainant explained as she continued to travel the driver of the *** made a left turn in front of her causing the vehicle to collide. The complainant was subsequently pushed into a stopped ***.
During our initial discussion of the loss with the complainant we informed her of her applicable coverage including collision and rental coverage. Since the collision coverage was subject to a $500 deductible the complainant elected to file her claim under the owner of the ***’s policy which also is insured with us.
On October 23, 2018, we obtained the driver of the *** recorded statement. The driver indicated that she was traveling westbound on *** Highway approaching the intersection of *** Street. She explained as she approached the intersection she noticed two vehicles ahead of her proceed to make left turns. She further explained as she crossed the stop bar the light changed from a green arrow to a yellow arrow, but she continued into the intersection as she believed she had the right of way. The driver struck the *** vehicle almost head on. The same day, we obtained a recorded statement from the driver of the ***. The driver of the 2002 *** indicated that he saw the *** collide with the ***, He indicated the *** was pushed into his vehicle. The driver of the *** did not provide an opinion of fault.
We reviewed the police report on November 8, 2018. The investigating officer detailed a narrative of the accident from each party’s point of view, but he did not issue citation or document contributing factors. Based on the evidence provided we determined the driver of the *** was majority responsible for the accident and apportioned 80% negligence since she did not observe right of way. However, since the complainant mentioned she did not see the *** enter the intersection prior to the impact we apportioned 20% responsibility for failure to keep a proper lookout.
Subsequent to receiving your letter we have taken the opportunity to review the accident scene and point of impact. We determined the complainant had the right of way since the driver of the *** should have yielded. Since she continued into the intersection when it was not safe to do and attempted to make an improper turn in front of the complainant, we believe the driver of the *** is solely responsible for the accident. We contacted the complainant and have made arrangements to repair her vehicle under the ***’s policy. We regret any inconvenience the complainant experienced.
If you have any further questions, please contact Gail M at , fax at , or ***@geico.com.
Sincerely,
Carl *. T
Assistant Vice President
[A default letter is provided here which indicates your acceptance of the business's response. If you wish, you may update it before sending it.]
Revdex.com: We are still working on getting all of this resolved. They are giving me a settlement on my ***, which I have accepted. They still need to pay my Daughter for her missed days of work from 2 jobs.
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID, and are still waiting on a settlement for my Daughter.
Regards
Law breaking, deceiving corporation that should be shut down after investigated for fraud. They quote customers, lock you in on price, have you switch over, make first payment, then only days before your next payment is due they send you a report that they ran your credit (WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION!) and now you have to pay $40 more a month. Oh but wait, when you call to sort it out, the plot thickens.. They tell you the reason for increase is due to a "ticket" on your DMV record but you actually don't have one, then another agent says they see the reason listed is because someone in your house hafca lapse of coverage once on a vehicle you don't own. ??? Seriously this GIANT company can't even get their story straight or explain how they had the legal right to run my credit or change my rate against the terms of policy... Bye!
no comment
If I could give 1 star I would. They are a joke and a scam. Agree to a monthly price in email and then change it two months in, raising it over $200 per month. JOKE
no comment
My policy has more than doubled. I understand I was involved in an accident but my policy qualified for accident forgiveness. Unfortunately, things happen in life and no one wants to have an accident. If you pay an insurance policy for years an you expect that when you need it most your insurance company will not take advantage to raise rates beyond your financial means.
They are great but the moment you have any occurrence they skyrocket the rates. Even if you have a great history with them that will not be taken into consideration.
no comment
They took our money and will not fix our car. A group of incompetent and useless employees. We have left numerous messages to the useless incompetent claims person, his manager and the liability person. We have sent formal complaints to corporate. I will go out of my way to tell every person I know how useless Geico is and how incompetent its employees are. Good job at failing to deliver the primary objective of your useless company.
no comment