Best In Sight Eye Care Center Reviews (28)
View Photos
Best In Sight Eye Care Center Rating
Address: 101 W 84th Ave STE 240, Thornton, Colorado, United States, 80260-4859
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Fax: |
+1 (303) 426-1180 |
Web: |
|
E-mails: |
Sign in to see
|
Add contact information for Best In Sight Eye Care Center
Add new contacts
ADVERTISEMENT
This serves as a further explanation and response to [redacted] complaint regarding his tax reduction ETR reduced his assessment from to The General/School tax rate increases yearly.Had the Total Assessed Value remained at with the increased 2014/School Tax Rate, his School Taxes would have been $10, Instead, due to the reduced assessment of 870, his School Taxes are $8,Hence; [redacted] received a School Tax Savings of $1,930.27.Had the Total Assessed Value remained at with the increased 2014/General Tax Rate, his General Taxes would have been $4, Instead, due to the reduced assessment of 870, his General Taxes are $3, Hence; [redacted] received a General Tax Savings of $ Each tax year stands alone due to the changes in tax rates Therefore, you cannot merely subtract one tax year from the next to get an accurate figure
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: [Your Answer Here] Never gave me any information as advertised and promised In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above Sincerely, [redacted] ***
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: I have read the response from ETRI have also logged onto the Nassau County Tax Assessors' website and brought up my tax history concerning General & School taxes from - 2015, using my property description [redacted] ***.The official records of Nassau County shows that in 2013, & there were no changes in the amounts paid for General Taxes (1st half- $& 2nd half - $1798.82)I went over my bank staements and checks of those amounts were written out the commissioner of taxes, Donald C***.The official records of Nassau County shows that in & my School Taxes were the same, 1st half - $& 2nd half $3554.29.The official records of Nassau County shows that School taxes were 1st half - $& 2nd half - $3133.20.The difference from & to was a total of - $If you take 40% of the "savings" the number is $50% would be $421.10.I do not know how ETR calculated their amount, but as per the Nassau County Tax site, they were trying to collect 100% + of the difference.The numbers are there for anyone to seeJust do the math.The flyer submitted by ETR states "Upon reduction our Discounted fee is 40% of 2014/Tax Savings In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above Sincerely, [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: They did not address the advertising issueThey never called me, and their only communication was a bill for $They never provided me a Competitive Market Analysis (CMA) and an appraisal as promisedThey failed to provide the services promised and advertised with zero communication on their progress Sincerely, [redacted] ***
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: To whom it may concern,If you read their advertised fee, you would come up with a simple calculation of subtracting your new taxes from last year's taxes paid and 40% of that number would be the feeThere is nothing in their ad that supports their manner of billingAgain if I knew I would be paying more than they were saving me, I would never have hired them In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above Sincerely, [redacted]
ETR, Incd/b/a Empire Tax Reductions has resolved this matter with [redacted]
[redacted] signed a contract (see attached) ETR Inc, d/b/a Empire Tax Reductions to reduce her property taxes for the 2014/tax roll Property Tax Grievances for the 2014/tax year were submitted by ETR Inc, d/b/a Empire Tax Reductions for Nassau County applicants on March *, Nassau County requires applications to be submitted a year in advance Nassau County grievances are negotiated and completed prior to applicants receiving their tax bill The proof of [redacted] property tax reduction is attached As stated in the determination; [redacted] ’s property tax reduction is based on a stipulation between the Nassau County Assessment Review Commission (ARC) and Representative; ETR Inc, d/b/a Empire Tax Reductions ETR has sent invoices for payment [redacted] has not paid for services rendered Please see attaches statement If any additional information is needed, please contact Empire Tax Reductions at [redacted]
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted] , and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because: [Your Answer Here] I not only called, I sent two letters (via registered mail, with return receipts that I still have) requesting the proof that my mother had a contract with themI specifically stated, both on the phone and in both letters I sent (copies of both letter are in my possession as well), that my mother has early onset Alzheimer's, which is why I was requesting the contract.It is funny that the contract never made its way to me but their collection letters managed to find their way In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above Sincerely, [redacted]
As per ETR's records, on July **, 2015, *** *** called ETR and requested proof of her mother's property tax reduction. As per ETR's records, the proof was sent the same day. ETR is very sympathetic, but also unaware of *** ***'s mother's medical condition of Alzheimer's. ETR is only aware that her mother has an outstanding balance that has not been paid for almost yearsWhen outstanding balances are unpaid for this length of time, the Collection proceedings begin
A Comparative Market Analysis (CMA) was done on *** *** property. ETR does not advertise that CMAs will be provided to clients. Additionally, *** *** was not charged for the CMA done on his property, therefore ETR is not obligated to provide the CMA to him.? Again, unfortunately, ETR was not able to reduce *** *** property taxes because his house is properly assessed at this time
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# ***, and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:
My 2014/tax rate was as follows.2014/School Tax: x 1,(per 100) = $8,746.55 (Starting Assessment x Tax Rate = Taxes)
2015/School Tax: x 1,(per 100) = $8,595.28 (Reduced Assessment x Tax Rate = Taxes) Total School Tax Savings = $151.27; 40% Fee = $60.51Their advertising states: *** *** *** ** *** ** *** *** *** *** *** ***See attached flyer.So in the end they are charging me more than what I actually save! Makes no senseIt's advertising! Who would sign up for this if they knew they pay more than they actually save?
In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above
Sincerely,
*** ***
This serves as an explanation
of *** *** property tax reductionPlease refer to the attached Summary of Reduction; proof of reduction (from the Nassau County Assessment Review Commission) and
2014/School Tax Bill.Starting Assessment was
Reduced Assessment is
824.2014/School Tax: x 1,(per 100) = $9, (Starting Assessment x Tax Rate = Taxes)2014/School Tax: x 1,(per 100) = $8, (Reduced Assessment x Tax Rate = Taxes)Had the Total Assessed Value
remained at his School Taxes
would have been $9,075.11. Instead
the reduced assessment of reduces School Taxes to $8,Total School Tax Savings = $479.83; 40% Fee
= $Joan
K***Collections/Accounts
Receivables ManagerEmpire Tax
Reductions (ETR)
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# ***, and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:
[Your Answer Here]
I am in email correspondence with *** *** *** of ETRShe has emailed me the company's explanation of my property tax reductionOn reviewing the spreadsheets, I still cannot see an explanation for the difference between their calculations and those on my Nassau County bill I have received from the TOH Receiver of Taxes, Donald XC***, ** I have requested from MsK*** a breakdown of the 1st and 2nd half calculations of the 2014/tax year.I will continue to correspond with representatives from ETR via email, so there are no miscommunications, misunderstandings or verbal inaccuracies until this issue comes to an amicable conclusion
In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above
Sincerely,
*** ***
This
serves as a further explanation and response to [redacted] complaint regarding his tax
reduction. ETR
reduced his assessment from 1062 to 870. The General/School tax rate increases yearly.Had the
Total Assessed Value remained at 1062 with the increased 2014/2015 School Tax Rate, his
School Taxes would have been $10,676.82. Instead, due to the reduced assessment of 870, his School Taxes are $8,746.55. Hence; [redacted] received a School Tax Savings of $1,930.27.Had the
Total Assessed Value remained at 1062 with the increased 2014/2015 General Tax Rate,
his General Taxes would have been $4,327.51. Instead, due to the reduced assessment of 870, his General Taxes are $3,545.14. Hence; [redacted] received a General Tax Savings of $782.38. Each tax
year stands alone due to the changes in tax rates. Therefore, you cannot merely subtract one tax
year from the next to get an accurate figure.
Revdex.com:At this time, I have not been contacted by Empire Tax Reductions, Inc. regarding complaint ID [redacted].Sincerely,[redacted]
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:
[Your Answer Here]
Never gave me any information as advertised and promised.
In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.
Sincerely,
[redacted]
[redacted] signed a contract with ETR Inc., d/b/a Empire Tax Reductions to reduce his property taxes for the 2014/2015 tax year. His signed contract for the 2014/2015 property tax reduction is attached. Also attached is the proof from the Nassau County Assessment Review Commission confirming...
that ETR was the “Representative” responsible for [redacted]’s 2014/2015 property tax reduction. Additionally, [redacted] can confirm that ETR was responsible for his property tax reduction for the 2014/2015 tax year by contacting: The Nassau County Assessment Review Commission: [redacted] / Phone: ###-###-#### / Fax: ###-###-#### / E-mail ARC . Point of Contact: [redacted].
[redacted],Please view [redacted] signed contract with Empire Tax Reductions (ETR) to reduce his property taxes. Said contract clearly states that should his case require an appeal, Court imposed filing fee ($30) may apply. His case required an appeal, hence $30 Court imposed...
filing fee applied.His contract also states, NO REDUCTION-NO FEE. Unfortunately, ETR was not able to reduce [redacted] property taxes. [redacted] house is properly assessed at this time. [redacted] was not charged a fee.A Comparative Market Analysis (CMA) was done on [redacted] property. ETR does CMA's as part of the property reduction process. Again, unfortunately, ETR was not able to reduce [redacted] property taxes. The conclusion is: [redacted] house is properly assessed at this time.Sincerely,Joan K[redacted]Collections Mgr.
This is in response to [redacted]’ complaint. [redacted]’ signed a contract for ETR Inc to reduce the property taxes on her property for the years 2010/2011; 2013/2014; and 2014/2015. See attached signed contracts by [redacted]. [redacted]’ husband, [redacted],...
signed a contract for ETR Inc to reduce the property taxes on their property for the years 2015/2016 and 2016/2017. Please see attached signed contracts by [redacted]’s husband [redacted]. ETR Inc. was successful and reduced the [redacted] property taxes each year. Please see attached proof from Nassau County Assessment Review Commission confirming that ETR Inc. reduced said taxes. ETR Inc. has sent numerous invoices to [redacted] and [redacted]. [redacted] and [redacted] refuse to pay for services rendered.
Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID# [redacted], and have determined that my complaint has NOT been resolved because:
I have read the response from ETR. I have also logged onto the Nassau County Tax Assessors' website and brought up my tax history concerning General & School taxes from 2013 - 2015, using my property description [redacted].The official records of Nassau County shows that in 2013, 2014 & 2015 there were no changes in the amounts paid for General Taxes (1st half- $1798.83 & 2nd half - $1798.82). I went over my bank staements and checks of those amounts were written out the commissioner of taxes, Donald C[redacted].The official records of Nassau County shows that in 2013 & 2014 my School Taxes were the same, 1st half - $3554.30 & 2nd half $3554.29.The official records of Nassau County shows that 2015 School taxes were 1st half - $3133.19 & 2nd half - $3133.20.The difference from 2013 & 14 to 2015 was a total of - $842.20 If you take 40% of the "savings" the number is $336.88. 50% would be $421.10.I do not know how ETR calculated their amount, but as per the Nassau County Tax site, they were trying to collect 100% + of the difference.The numbers are there for anyone to see. Just do the math.The flyer submitted by ETR states "Upon reduction our Discounted fee is 40% of 2014/15 Tax Savings.
In order for the Revdex.com to appropriately process your response, you MUST answer the question above.
Sincerely,
[redacted]