Spokane Property Services

Our law firm appreciates the opportunity to respond to the allegations contained within Mr [redacted] 's complaintOur office will be responding to Mr [redacted] directly We would like to respond directly to the Revdex.com however the federal laws applicable to this situation, and under which we operate, do not allow us to respond to a third party without receiving a specific authorization directly from the complainantThe law does not allow the required authorization to be relayed through a third party such as the Revdex.com nor does it allow us to consider the filing of a complaint with the Revdex.com as the required authorization

We have received the complaint in regards to Ms*** ***We will be responding to the consumer directly

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 10, 2016/02/18) */
Mr***;
I am unable to access the complaint online via your websiteMy records indicate this firm attempted to contact Ms*** on November 30, 2015, December 8, 2015, and Jan 21, Ms*** contact the firm on
January 21, I have reviewed the recordings of the messages which were left, and the conversation with Ms*** and the actions of this firm were professional and respectfulThe firm will not contact Ms*** other than in the context of any litigation
Thanks,
*** Rose
Attorney at Law
The Rose Law Firm, PLLC
***
Hopkins, MN
Office (952) ***
Fax (952) ***
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or protected by lawIf you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the content of this information is prohibitedIf you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and any attachments without reading o
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /* (3000, 12, 2016/02/23) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
Apparently he didn't listen closely because she was nastyI will pay this medical bill off so they will not have a reason to contact meThank you for your help

Initial Business Response /* (1000, 7, 2015/08/03) */
This matter was referred to the firm in June No payments or payment arrangements were madeA Judgment was issued by the court in this matterGarnishments amounts are mandated by Minnesota Law
Initial Consumer Rebuttal /*
(3000, 9, 2015/08/04) */
(The consumer indicated he/she DID NOT accept the response from the business.)
I understand that the garnishment is mandated by law but you are not required to take out the maximum 25% of my paycheck!! I've done the research and I know you can take less if you are willing to and that is all I'm asking! I'm poor like most of America and the full maximum penalty is killing me! I have a ton of other bills to pay! I was still offering to pay $every weeks, isn't that good enough?? You already know you are going to get the full amount eventually whether I like it or not!

Our law firm appreciates the opportunity to respond to the allegations contained within Mr. [redacted]'s complaint. Our office will be responding to Mr. [redacted] directly.   We would like to respond directly to the Revdex.com however the federal laws applicable to this situation, and...

under which we operate, do not allow us to respond to a third party without receiving a specific authorization directly from the complainant. The law does not allow the required authorization to be relayed through a third party such as the Revdex.com nor does it allow us to consider the filing of a complaint with the Revdex.com as the required authorization.