Reed Masonry & Concrete Brian Clark Reviews (1)
Reed Masonry & Concrete Brian Clark Rating
Description: MASON CONTRACTORS
Address: 5200 Brightwood Road #214, Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, United States, 15102
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Add contact information for Reed Masonry & Concrete Brian Clark
Add new contacts
ADVERTISEMENT
Review: This contractor was hired to repair walls, point front of house and install a light fixture in June. The job was supposed to take up to two weeks; he was here approximately 4 months. The house was not pointed correctly, i.e., mortar color and mixture wrong, he missed spots and inadequately filled in between the bricks. We had to hire another contractor at several thousands of dollars to repair what he had done. The walls that were just repaired by him now have cracks in them. There is a large receptacle of debris (bricks, stones,etc.) still sitting on our property. The garage door is marked with mortar and concrete spots. The driveway has cement on it from his work. The light fixture was not installed properly and we had someone else come in to do the job right. We have asked him several times to remove the debris and clean the garage door with no success in having him respond.Desired Settlement: - Haul away the debris that was left behind.- Clean garage door of cement/mortar.- Repair the cracks that are forming in the walls he just "repaired". Redo if necessary.
Business
Response:
Dear Sir or Madam:
This is in response to your letter dated November 8, 2013.
The following is the account of activity from your letter. I have added numbering so that
I may address each item individually.
Customer's Statement of the Problem:
[1] This contractor was hired to repair walls, point front of house and install a light
fixture in June. [2] The job was supposed to take up to two weeks; he was here
approximately 4 months. [3] The house was not pointed correctly, i.e., mortar color and
mixture wrong, he missed spots and inadequately filled in between the bricks. We had to
hire another contractor at several thousands of dollars to repair what he had done. [4]
The walls that were just repaired by him now have cracks in them. [5] There is a large
receptacle of debris (bricks, stones, etc.) still sitting on our property. [6) The garage door
is marked with mortar and concrete spots. The driveway has cement on it from his work.
[7) The light fixture was not installed properly and we had someone else come in to do
the job right. [*5] We have asked him several times to remove the debris and [*6]
clean
the garage door with no success in having him respond.
Desired Settlement:
-
[*5] Haul away the debris that was left behind.
-
[*6] Clean garage door of cement/mortar.
-
[*4] Repair the cracks that are forming in the walls he just “repaired”. Redo if
necessary.
[1] The estimate for the job was prepared on June 27, 2013 and was agreed to on July 6,
2013 by the customer. The contractor started the job the following Monday, July 8, 2013.
[2] Yes, the contractor was there for more than 2 weeks due to weather and other
circumstances, including Mrs. Customer’s request to have things redone, because she
didn't “like” it, even though it wasn’t finished and she didn’t see the “whole picture”.
[3] The contractor pointed the house and we received a downpour of rain causing the
mortar to run from between the bricks. The contractor attempted to remedy the situation
by using muriatic acid to clean up the mortar. The customers would not allow the
contractor to come back to remedy the situation.
The customer told the contractor that they were hiring another contractor to fix this and
requested $1,450 of their money be returned, which the contractor did so by check
number [redacted] drawn on[redacted] account on October 9, 2013. As the contractor was
returning money, written on the check was also the statement “paid in full, no recourse”.
The customer altered the face of the check by scratching out the statement. He also
signed the back of the check and cashed it. I have a copy of the duplicate check written
with the statement on it.
[4] The walls were repaired. Cracks appearing in these walls are hairline cracks, which
happens to concrete, especially living in the northern climate. In addition, the finish
covers these hairline cracks, that is why it was given a half-crescent finish. Therefore, the
contractor will not be returning to “fix” these hairline cracks.
In addition, the contractor repaired the back of the wall as requested by the customer,
which was not part of the contracted amount. The contractor paid for the labor and
materials for this out of his pocket.
[5] The “large receptacle of debris” the customer refers to is a 56 quart (14 gallon)
Rubbermaid container. The container was originally filled with debris from the job and
the lid was on it. Rocks and other debris was placed on top of the original debris and
made the container 2x the weight it was originally. In addition, the container was
“dropped off’ in the parking lot of the contractor’s residence sometime between 5:00pm
and 10:30pm Thursday, November 14, 2013. Since the “large receptacle of debris” has
been dumped in the parking lot of the contractor’s residence, there is no need for the
contractor to return to the customer’s to retrieve it.
[6] The markings on the garage door were there prior to this job; therefore, the contractor
will not be return to clean the garage door.
[7] The contractor purchased a light fixture, which Mrs. Customer decided she didn’t like.
The contractor put the light up until he could get a new fixture to replace the one he
purchased. The customer then hired someone else to put up a new fixture. The customer
requested an additional $75 from the contractor, which the contractor did so by
check drawn on [redacted] account on or around October 30, 2013. Again, as the contractor
was returning money, written on the check was the statement “paid in full, no recourse”.
He also have to cash this check.
If you have any additional questions please contact me.
Consumer
Response: