Moyle Mink & Tannery Reviews (8)
View Photos
Moyle Mink & Tannery Rating
Address: 374 S 600 W, Heyburn, Idaho, United States, 83336-9751
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Web: |
|
Add contact information for Moyle Mink & Tannery
Add new contacts
ADVERTISEMENT
Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because:Moyle M [redacted] and Tannery, keep changing the conversationA tannery should know the difference between a RED marten and a PLAIN martenMy original questions still remain.Enclosed pictures , of the stich in DOK mark, they placed on hide#2#one has a magic marker on it, the other Nothing Why do the hides in question not have this DOKmark?Original email: Red Marten sent to you, received a plain marten with feet inI do not skin feet in Beaver, an XL fur was sent, received a medium or small Sincerely, [redacted]
Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] ,and find that Mediation is necessary.In hoping to further the mediation process on Sept 6, 2017, I mailed via USPS the Marten in question, Certified Mail receipt and Signature Receipt # [redacted] to Moyle M [redacted] and Tannery.Regards, [redacted]
RevDex.com:I would like to reject the offer of Mediation for complaint ID [redacted] . Customer agreed that the beaver did belong to him and returned the marten, stating that it was not his and wanted us to look for his marten. Since customer contacted us directly, we are working on resolving the matter with him directly. Thank you for your help.
Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:Moyle M[redacted] and Tannery, keep changing the conversation. A tannery should know the difference between a RED marten and a PLAIN marten. My original questions still remain.Enclosed 3 pictures , 1. of the stich in DOK mark, they placed on hide. #2#3 one has a magic marker on it, the other Nothing. Why do the hides in question not have this DOKmark?Original email:
1. Red Marten sent to you, received a plain marten with feet in. I do not
skin feet in.
2. Beaver, an XL fur was sent, received a medium or small.
Sincerely,
[redacted]
Re: Invoice: [redacted]/Confirmation [redacted] Customer#: [redacted] I have attached email correspondence. Our company did try and work with Mr. [redacted], customer refused to return hides; after we offered credit for the tanning if in fact these hides did not have his punch code, and...
offered him replacement hides. Customer claims to have received 2 out of the 5 furs incorrectly, upon arrival of the skins, we must review order for proper documentation, then enter in our system and marked with skin code and/or plastic tags, then sorted into bins. (See attached email). Customer sent pictures of a small portion of the hides, we cannot properly inspect the codes; the code assigned to his account is DOK. We cannot guarantee that plastic tags remain on the hides due to the process. As far as the damage on the marten, our policy is clear due to many variables… (see attached) all tanning is at customers own risk, and hides were accepted on this basis only. Customer claims that we would lose the hides if he returns them, yet he claims these are not his. If the hides were crossed somehow in sorting I would have another customer with the same complaint. As most customers want their original hides whether in prime condition or not. We treat all our customer fairly, small or large accounts. Although not likely, if there is an error in coding our policy is that the hides be returned for inspection and if error is found a credit is given on tanning, at times if we have replacements we do offer replacement hides. I have attached copies of invoice, order form, delivery receipt, delay notice and terms and conditions. We strongly encourage our customers to read all the documents prior to shipping hides. If in fact these are not his hides, we need them returned so that we may return to the rightful owner and to continue our research on his hides, without the hides, we will be unable to review and/or inspect and no credits will be given.
Revdex.com:I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID .[redacted], , and find that Mediation is necessary.In hoping to further the mediation process on Sept 6, 2017, I mailed via USPS the Marten in question, Certified Mail receipt and Signature Receipt #[redacted]. to Moyle M[redacted] and Tannery.Regards,[redacted]
Revdex.com:I would like to reject the offer of Mediation for complaint ID [redacted]. Customer agreed that the beaver did belong to him and returned the marten, stating that it was not his and wanted us to look for his marten. Since customer contacted us directly, we are working on resolving the matter with him directly. Thank you for your help.