They should've advised me to the amount they would be recharging me for the same procedure that's was already done or give me options of pulling the tooth been cheeper 425.00 is way to much to pay to keep for one tooth. I have been going here for years and until dr. Buskill did not have these problems he should not be allowed to recharge for the same thing as a result if his work I only want him to be Fair about the bill I feel that 45.0 0 is my responsibility for the mess up. Thanks
I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Regards,
[redacted]
This patient is mistaken in her claim. I treated patient for the loss of some filling material on tooth #13 in October. The "rear half" of her tooth (also known as the distal ) was broken and restored by me. In early November the "front half " of her tooth (also known as the mesial ) broke. My...
filling material that was recently placed remained intact as evidenced by Dr [redacted] notes and a radiograph taken. Dr [redacted] then filled in this missing front half. These are two completely different fillings in two completely different parts of the same tooth. It is not uncommon for a patient to be confused by this .
They should've advised me to the amount they would be recharging me for the same procedure that's was already done or give me options of pulling the tooth been cheeper 425.00 is way to much to pay to keep for one tooth. I have been going here for years and until dr. Buskill did not have these problems he should not be allowed to recharge for the same thing as a result if his work I only want him to be Fair about the bill I feel that 45.0 0 is my responsibility for the mess up. Thanks
I have reviewed the response offer made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.Regards,
[redacted]
This patient is mistaken in her claim. I treated patient for the loss of some filling material on tooth #13 in October. The "rear half" of her tooth (also known as the distal ) was broken and restored by me. In early November the "front half " of her tooth (also known as the mesial ) broke. My...
filling material that was recently placed remained intact as evidenced by Dr [redacted] notes and a radiograph taken. Dr [redacted] then filled in this missing front half. These are two completely different fillings in two completely different parts of the same tooth. It is not uncommon for a patient to be confused by this .