Legacy Property Management

Complaint: [redacted] I am rejecting this response because:At no time did [redacted] reach out to resolve the unscrupulous practice of strong arming tenant into forcing them into re-signing a lease under duress of a 50% rent increaseI contacted them on Sept 1, in order to understand this nefarious business practice of failing to give proper written notification (days prior)I was not contacted by a lease consultant, rather, I contacted [redacted] and spoke with a reception who attempted to explain their business practices of increasing rent in order to get tenant(s) to re-sign a leases agreementThe reception, was also miffed that I was not contacted prior to the expiration of my lease by a lease consultant in order to arrange an amicable contract., The reception stated someone would contact me soon about a new lease, I was not contacted, after several days, I subsequently gave my notice to vacate the residence on Oct 10th, The issue is the failure to properly notify tenant(s) in writing days (days for month to month rent) prior to expiration of lease agreement from previous property management company of rent increase.The second issue is the blatant increase in rent which is purely retaliatory for a tenant who may not choose to re-sign an extended lease, even when current state law requires property owners (property management) to notify tenant(s) of rent increases.The next issue is a rent increase after months of tenancy.Lastly, on its face, a 50% increase in rent can only be perceived as retaliatory, and a clear violation of Oregon House Bill [redacted] (rent increase may coincide with market value)A two-bedroom rents for roughly $a month at this current property located at [redacted]

We did not increase Mr*** rent as it was a previously agreed to increase at the time Mr*** entered into his lease with *** *** ***Please see attached lease agreementWe reached out to Mr*** and offered to enter into a new lease with him and sign at a monthly
rate of $which would be and increase of $over his previous lease amountMr*** declined and submitted his day notice to vacate on September 5th 2017(also attached)We took over management of this property 06/01/We are not at any fault

This company was authorized to deliver farm equipment from Medford Oreto Prescott Valley, AzThey were one day late bringing the equipment to my home and started to offload the machineryThey used the backhoe to remove my attachments and placed them on my trailerI was beginning to inspect the equipment when the drivers needed to goThey were paid for the delivery and leftUpon completing my inspection I noticed a box on top of my brand new mower deck The driver told me when he delivered it to keep it on there as it was heavy and he would offload it with the mower deck Well the drivers left and I removed the box on the mower deck only to discover a hole in the deck, a large punctureAlso the deck was bowed and support bars were bentI called the transport company immediately and left a message I made a claim to there insurance because they owed me for the damageThe insurance company denied the claim because the was no information about the damage on a bill of lading that was not given to me to sign

Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:At no time did [redacted] reach out to resolve the unscrupulous practice of strong arming tenant into forcing them into re-signing a lease under duress of a 50% rent increase. I contacted them on Sept 1, 2017 in order to understand this nefarious business practice of failing to give proper written notification (30 days prior). I was not contacted by a lease consultant, rather, I contacted [redacted] and spoke with a reception who attempted to explain their business practices of increasing rent in order to get tenant(s) to re-sign a leases agreement. The reception, was also miffed that I was not contacted prior to the expiration of my lease by a lease consultant in order to arrange an amicable contract., The reception stated someone would contact me soon about a new lease, I was not contacted, after several days, I subsequently gave my notice to vacate the residence on Oct 10th, 2017.    The issue is the failure to properly notify tenant(s) in writing 90 days (7 days for month to month rent) prior to expiration of lease agreement from previous property management company of rent increase.The second issue is the blatant increase in rent which is purely retaliatory for a tenant who may not choose to re-sign an extended lease, even when current state law requires property owners (property management) to notify tenant(s) of rent increases.The next issue is a rent increase after 6 months of tenancy.Lastly, on its face, a 50% increase in rent can only be perceived as retaliatory, and a clear violation of Oregon House Bill [redacted] (rent increase may coincide with market value). A two-bedroom rents for roughly $1200 a month at this current property located at [redacted].