Hoover's Used Cars Reviews (5)
View Photos
Hoover's Used Cars Rating
Address: 2108 Frankstown Road, Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 16648-7116
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Web: |
|
Add contact information for Hoover's Used Cars
Add new contacts
ADVERTISEMENT
To [redacted] payoff was handled on 8-16-2016 as per attached proof of shipping receipt. She was giving the same answer... everytime she called after that date, with that answer being “ Bank has yet to clear the check." [redacted] did not dear the check until 8/24/16. The check was mailed so it was up to her bank to finalize the loan. I am sorry for any delays but they were solely on her bank no clearing the check in a timely manner.Thanks,Michael [redacted] P***Hoover's Used Cars [redacted]
Michael P*** from Hoovers contacted me today and stated my vehicle in now paid off and I will be getting a refund checkI also verified this with the bank
To *** *** *** payoff was handled on 8-16-as per attached proof of shipping receiptShe was giving the same answer
everytime she called after that date, with that answer being “ Bank has yet to clear the check." *** *** did not dear the check until 8/24/The check was mailed so it was up to her bank to finalize the loanI am sorry for any delays but they were solely on her bank no clearing the check in a timely manner.Thanks,Michael * P***Hoover's Used Cars***
To ***
*** *** payoff was handled on 8-16-as per attached proof of shipping receiptShe was giving the same answer everytime she called after that date, with that answer being “ Bank has yet to clear the check." *** *** did not dear the check until 8/24/The check was mailed so it was up to her bank to finalize the loanI am sorry for any delays but they were solely on her bank no clearing the check in a timely manner.Thanks,Michael * P***Hoover's Used Cars***
Yes it was handled but I traded my vehicle in on 8/1/and Michael price did not attempt to pay off my trade in until 8/as he stated which is when my next payment was dueHe clearly was scamming me so his payoff would be less