FYi Doctors Reviews (10)
View Photos
FYi Doctors Rating
Description: Optical Goods - Retail
Address: 1 804 Main St SE, Redwood City, California, United States, 94063-7037
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Web: |
www.airdriespecsoptometry.ca
|
Add contact information for FYi Doctors
Add new contacts
ADVERTISEMENT
Sadly is not the first time. Last set of glasses were of similar difficulty.
Had numerous tests done on eyes regarding neurological issue it turned out. Not that FYI ever shared any information following exams. 2 Years later when I asked, I got the info during different appointment.
FYI Water Street Cambridge has the WORST service possible. Never to return again. Getting too big to do anyone any good. Sold out to large clientele rather than even minimal service.
Angela, they exploited my mom, too. I wrote a review under "momsmatter." They said MTO referrals were so rare they never ask if you're referred. Instead they shocked us with a $245 fee for her eye exam.
I and finished with this organization. I'm speaking of their office in New Minas, Nova Scotia.I was prepped for a eye exam, waited 20 minutes for eye drops to set in, when a young lady comes in with her daughter and was prepped after me. I was sitting in the waiting area a good 15 minutes before they returned from their prep exam. I was in the waiting area as I was the next to go in, then the receptionist bypassed me and sent the young lady and her child in. I questioned the receptionist on this and her excuse was I needed 20 minutes for the eye drops to set. I told her its been a half our since the drops were administered. All she could say was "Oh, I'm sorry". Not good enough.What a joke. That was it for me dealing with this outfit! Not only was I annoyed with the high cost of their glasses, even with two insurances covering me, I'm tired of the amateur employees they have representing them. Good bye!
On September 21, 2015 I took my eyeglasses into FYidoctors on Hamilton Street for an adjustment. This is the store from which I purchased my glasses. The optician, [redacted], used a heating device which I understood was required before adjusting the temples. On her third attempt she cracked the temple and said, "Whoops I think I cracked your temple in a couple spots. Yes, I did." Normally, I am in and out the store in 5 minutes when getting my glasses adjusted. Today, [redacted] was distracted and unfocused in the 15 -20 minutes she spent with me.She apologized, then left to go to another area of the store to apply heat shrink tape to prevent the temple from falling apart. No further adjustments were attempted after the glasses were damaged. Two options for repair were discussed. The first option was that [redacted] would find a replacement temple from the supplier in Montreal. The second, which I suggested, was to find another temple that might fit the glasses. She said this would be difficult. [redacted] said to leave it to her to first look for a replacement. If a temple was available, it would arrive within a day or two of the order. When I did not receive a call from FYidoctors after the fourth day, I called the store on September 25 and left a message with the receptionist. [redacted] called me back about two hours later and informed me that all attempts to find a replacement had failed. She gave me two options. The first was to surrender my glasses and she would try to match up a temple to my frame. She said the chances were slim that another temple would work or match. This would only be done when she had spare time. Meaning I could be without my glasses for an indefinite period of time. The second option was to offer me a $75 credit towards the purchase of a new set of glasses. Considering I paid $961, the credit offer is inadequate, when it was the fault of the business, as the left temple was not cracked or damaged prior to the adjustment. [redacted] argued the cause was my glasses were old, and that it underwent a few adjustments; neither which I accepted as valid arguments.P[redacted]Desired SettlementWhen I told [redacted] that I would speak to the owners as the next step, she essentially said I could try but would not succeed beyond her offer. She also said they did not have to compensate me at all for damaging my glasses. My preferred resolution if that the business accept full responsibility and provide me with a refund of $281. This is the price I paid for the eyeglass frames. [redacted]Business Response [redacted] This patient is concerned that we broke his glasses when attempting to adjust them. This can happen any time a pair of glasses is adjusted, even occasionally when working on a brand new pair. Breakage or cracking is much more likely to happen to a pair such as the patient's that is over 3 years old and that has had the temples adjusted on several occasions. The staff member he was working with has over 30 years of experience as an optician in the optical industry. She (along with all of our optical dispensing staff) take pride in their work, both on a technical level and in striving to meet patient needs and address patient concerns. We are a very busy office every day but the optician was not in a particular hurry the day she was assisting this patient. The crack in the temple of his glasses was unfortunate and could have happened at any time. Unfortunately, despite much effort, a replacement pair of temples could not be found. The patient is not satisfied with the compensation that was offered to him, that being a $75 credit to be used towards new glasses. This compensation is not unreasonable given that the frame originally cost $281(his lenses cost $680) and is now over 3 years old. It should be noted that we have always treated this patient very fairly. In September of 2012, when he picked up his new glasses, he took them home then decided he did not like how they looked. We replaced them with a brand new pair of frames and lenses at no cost to him. Also, in October 2014, his lenses were scratched but were no longer covered under warranty. Again, we replaced them at no cost to him. [redacted] He is requesting a refund of the full amount he paid for his frames 3 years ago in the amount of $281. We will provide this refund to the patient so that he can purchase new eyewear elsewhere. Normally when a full refund is given, we request that the product be returned to us. Given that the patient has no other glasses, this will not be required in this case.Consumer Response (The consumer indicated he/she ACCEPTED the response from the business.)I accept the refund in the amount of $281 to close the complaint. Thank you.I would like to clarify two statements for the record:1. "In September of 2012, when he picked up his new glasses, he took them home then decided he did not like how they looked." My prescription did not translate into the optician recommending an appropriate frame even after hearing my concerns. I went with the recommendation as I trusted the optician. The result however was extremely disappointing, not only to me, but the optician. I did not have to 'push' to get a new pair of glasses. A quick decision was supported by the management to provide a new pair of glasses with a smaller frame. To this date, I have to say that I still appreciate this gesture of customer service.2. "Also, in October 2014, his lenses were scratched but were no longer covered under warranty. Again, we replaced them at no cost to him."I was told that I still had coverage just before the end of the warranty period. Also, it was not for scratches, but for the coatings which had failed prematurely as was how the optician explained it to me.