Finders Keepers

Both parties were pre screened and then introduced to each other by phone They, together decided on the phone interview to exchange their personal information and schedule a date (going against suggested protocol) They eliminated the next process of preparation In debriefing
both of them after their physical date, they said that the dinner portion went well Although it was discussed by all parties that drinking was something to be avoided on their date, they both elected to go downtown from dinner and drink We can not be responsible for what adult people decide to do on a date But we can suggest what to avoid and point out any potential pit falls Drinking was definitely discussed We feel badly that this date ended up on a negative but we feel it could have been avoided if the parties went through the protocol rather than going out on their own Our Contract does not guarantee chemistry, only the introduction to compatible individuals, which they were in every way They had a hrand minphone interview, where they were bothpre screened each other and were overwhelmed with how much they had in common All of this can be validated We did exactly what we promised to do and will honor this member for the duration of her Contract Hopefully, she will elect to partake in the various activities that she signed up for

Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because: There is still no recognition of normal wear and tear damages by Finders Keepers. All of our deposits, both security and pet deposits were withheld by the business. There should not be an additional $1000 charged, especially due to normal wear and tear of an older property. I am still very upset about being sent to collections for an issue that was never resolved. The fact that the business came up with additional charges 30 days after move out is illegal. 
Regards,
[redacted]

I have not seen any e mail and Dennis does not recall talking to the gentleman, WEI no longer exists but I will send someone to the gentleman's home to check out the problem, I will have him call and set a time up for this Friday if that is a doable date for him.  We always try to solve problems as they arise but since wedid not receive the original call when the leak happened we are now playing catch up.  Calling [redacted] is the right thing to do, but we will also check out the roof for him.

Revdex.com:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and find that this resolution is satisfactory to me.
Good morning,   I recently submitted a compliant to the Revdex.com, and upon walking outside of my house this morning, I saw...

that the fence has started to be built. It may have started yesterday, but there was not response from the company. None the less they have started the building of the fence so I would like to close my side of the case, and state that my problem has been fixed. Thank you. 
Regards,
[redacted]

Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because: I did indeed contact Welch Enterprises by phone, whether they made a record of it or not.  I called the phone number listed on my contract:  ###-###-####.  I spoke first to a woman who seemed to be a general receptionist who then transferred my call to a gentleman who listened to my complaint then took down my name, phone number and email. He said he would look up my contract and contact me. I also did contact Welch Enterprises by email, using the "contact us" link on the company's website.  My attachment shows both my emails and how their website lists their contact email address as [redacted]
 None of my roofing issues would have happened if I had not been given bad advice from Welch Enterprises about using shingles on the flatter part of my roof, which appears to go against industry standards according to other roofers. I will contact [redacted] to see if they can help resolve this issue.
Sincerely,
[redacted]

In response to the "rejecting the response", I believe we must agree to disagree.  If the residents would like to make a settlement offer they must contact TTMarketing.  I will take any offer they have to the owners for approval.  Thank you for your services.

Both parties were pre screened and then introduced to each other by phone.  They, together decided on the phone interview to exchange their personal information and schedule a date (going against suggested protocol).  They eliminated the next process of preparation.  In debriefing...

both of them after their physical date, they said that the dinner portion went well.  Although it was discussed by all parties that drinking was something to be avoided on their date, they both elected to go downtown from dinner and drink.  We can not be responsible for what adult people decide to do on a date.  But we can suggest what to avoid and point out any potential pit falls.  Drinking was definitely discussed.  We feel badly that this date ended up on a negative but we feel it could have been avoided if the parties went through the normal protocol rather than going out on their own.  Our Contract does not guarantee chemistry, only the introduction to compatible individuals, which they were in every way.  They had a 1 hr. and 45 min. phone interview, where they were bothpre screened each other and were  overwhelmed with how much they had in common.  All of this can be validated.  We did exactly what we promised to do and will honor this member for the duration of her Contract.  Hopefully, she will elect to partake in the various activities that she signed up for.