Baccarat Secure

This is nothing but the D'Alembert system. It does have a chance of working for the hit and run player, but over the long run it is a losing system. Banker has a 1.06% edge, so it is not a 50/50 game like he claims. You also have to pay a commission on any bank wins. He also says it is infinitely beatable with players hedging on each others bets. I have no idea how you can come out ahead if you are betting one unit on player and you partner hedges it on banker. The best you could do is break even if its a player win and you would be down by the commission amount if banker won. I gave this method a fair chance in a land based casino and here is the result.

I started with $1,160 on 05/01/21 and played a couple times a week for a total of 31 sessions. I have $1,045 left today, 11/30/21. I got really lucky on 06/12/21 and caught a dragon tail winning streak which netted me $1,000. If it weren't for that very lucky day, i'd be down $1,115 instead of just $115.

First of all, the claim is made that baccarat is a 50-50 game, which it is not. The bank wins more hands than the player over the long haul, so there goes your 50-50. Nextly, your line of reasoning is bogus, as you fail to take into account the many times when you and your 6 stooges will sit down and lose 10 in a row (or more, lol). And please don't tell me that they will be betting opposite to each other, as all that does is possibly generate more commission for the already filthy rich casinos. Sorry, buddy, but your 'system' is a crock. Even using the word 'system' is a red flag. Try 'method'.