Automobile Club of Southern California Reviews (562)
View Photos
Automobile Club of Southern California Rating
Description: Insurance Companies, Insurance - Accident & Health, Insurance - Long Term Care, Insurance Rating Bureaus, Insurance Services, Road Service - Automotive
Address: 100 E. Wilbur Road, Thousand Oaks, California, United States, 91360
Phone: |
Show more...
|
Web: |
|
Add contact information for Automobile Club of Southern California
Add new contacts
ADVERTISEMENT
Review: I recently sign up with there insurance company then after a week my premium went up from $954 to $1100
I ask why and they said because of my mileage but promise me it will go down after a few weeks but instead it went up again to $1200.
I tried to talk to them about it but there response was wait next month and it will go down " just dont drive "
Getting convince it will eventually go down I agree for one month but instead it went up another $100 to $1354.
This is crazy I went to triple AAA because my monthly premium went down instead it kept going up and when I finally decided enough was enough they still charge me $51 extra .
They should have warn me that there very sensitive with small stuff and that they will raise my premium every week . Im a very good driver and what if I decided to go for a long trip on that week do they have to raise it each time ???Desired Settlement: Just waive the $51 fee and tell there new customer that if you want triple AAA car insurance be prepared your premium might go up every two weeks for driving more .
Business
Response:
We would like to take this opportunity to extend our apologies for the frustration you have experienced with our sales agent, Mr. [redacted]. It is our understanding that you agreed to an auto insurance policy premium of $954.00, which was bound on May 5, 2014. However, one week later, on May 13, 2014, Mr. [redacted] discovered a mistake he made during the binding process that was related to your annual mileage, which caused your premium to increase to $1296.00. This increase was the direct result of the actual [redacted]eter reading versus the estimated annual mileage information you provided to Mr. [redacted]. The Auto Club uses annual mileage as a rating factor in determining auto insurance premiums, in compliance with California Proposition 103. It is our understanding that after you were informed of the substantial increase of your premium, you chose to cancel your policy with us, which left you with an outstanding balance of $51.79. [redacted], Regional Supervisor, has spoken with you regarding this increased premium and she has agreed to waive the $51.79 earned premium that we had initially billed you as this was the result of our error. We are pleased we are able to make this accommodation. We assure you that it was never our agent’s intention to mislead you in any way. Unfortunately, he made an honest mistake by not updating the new premium after entering the [redacted]eter reading that you had provided. Ms. [redacted] has addressed this with Mr. [redacted]’s manager, Mr. [redacted], who has provided additional training to Mr. [redacted] to prevent a recurrence. Should you have any questions, please contact [redacted] at [redacted].
Review: After the Accident occurred, I contacted the insurance adjuster and informed her that I had a witness list, which was important to my case. I received a call four months later, where I was informed of the fact that they never received the witness list and I was at fault for the accident. This was outrageous. they never informed me of not receiving the witness list, therefore I assumed that they received it.Other information was also sent to the insurance adjuster, however; they still placed the blame on me. this has left me to believe that the individuals working on my case are unable to make a correct at fault assesstment or they have the wrong assesstment to save their company the cost of litfation, which will result in an increasing of my insurance premiums.Desired Settlement: Change the at fault assesstment or hire a third party assessor(not related to the company) to make a determination. I will be happy with a third party judgement on the matter
Business
Response:
We received this same complaint from the California Department of Insurance (CDI). Our response to the CDI is as follows: You reported this loss to us on 3-06-2013. That same day, our Claims Service Representative, [redacted], spoke with your daughter [redacted] who was translating for you. She indicated that you were exiting a driveway onto [redacted] Street when the other party’s vehicle lost control and collided with your vehicle. She further stated that the police were called to the scene but no report was filed and no injuries were reported. She also stated there were two witnesses to this incident and would email the information to us. The next day, during a conversation with your son, we again requested the witness information. He indicated he would have to obtain it and send it along with photos from the scene of the accident. We contacted Allstate, the other party’s carrier, and spoke with the Service Representative for the other party. Her clients report stated that he was traveling at approximately 30 mph in lane two of two when your vehicle exited a driveway and collided with the right side of his car. Emails received from your son on 3-15-2013 with photos from the scene did not contain any witness information. No witness information was ever received from your daughter. A vice message was left for you on 7-19-2013 requesting witness information but there was no response to our request. Based on our investigation and the information available to us, you were informed of our liability determination on this matter and a fault letter confirming our decision was mailed to you on 7-24-2013. Witness information was again requested from your son during his conversations with Mr. [redacted] on 7-31-2013 and 8-19-2013 and during their meeting on 8-20-2013. He indicted he would have to look for the information but felt the witness would not remember the incident. No witness information has been provided to date. After careful review of the information available to us, we regret to inform you our principally at fault conclusion as appropriate. Should you have any additional information you believe pertinent to this matter, please contact [redacted] at 562-627-7225.
Review: On or about March 26, 2015, I contacted AAA Insurance to get a quote for Home and Auto Insurance. I spoke to the [redacted], Sales Agent and received all of the information requested, including an estimate. I compared it to what I presently had with [redacted] and decided to buy insurance with AAA.I called to start the process I was sent a quote that was higher than the estimate originally provided. I spoke to his supervisor, [redacted] whom explain the reason why it was higher. She also informed me that [redacted] was a new agent and had missed a few things in the original quote. My husband and I reviewed the policy sent via e-mail and agreed to switch to AAA. We provided all of the necessary information and the process was complete.During the end of April, 2015, a letter was received from our mortgage company stating that they didn't have record of our home insurance. I immediately contacted AAA and the representative handled things properly. Apparently the prior agent had not process my paperwork correctly.I continued to make my monthly payments and it was business as usual. Until early June when I called to make payment and the automated service told me that my home insurance was cancelled. I immediately called AAA and found out [redacted] was no longer there. I was transferred to [redacted] to find out that AAA did not cover my home because it was set on a canyon (considered a fire hazard). Yes, no insurance and we were never notified.Desired Settlement: The sales agents license should be suspended.
Business
Response:
It is our understanding that on March 26,
2015 you spoke with our agent, Mr. [redacted], who assisted you with the
purchase of auto and homeowners insurance policies. After agreeing to [redacted]’s quotations, you made a down
payment of $10.00 to establish the homeowners policy with an effective date of
March 27, 2015. On May 6, 2015, a Notice of Cancellation was mailed
advising you that the policy was pending cancellation, effective May 31, 2015,
due to the underwriting department having not received all of the required
signed documents and complete underwriting information. Several days later, on May 15, 2015, you called our Policy Management Group to
inquire on the status of your policy whereas that time you were informed that
it was pending cancellation due to a returned payment. [redacted], Insurance Business Manager, informs us that on July 9, 2015, several
weeks after your initial contact with our Policy Management Group agent, she
became aware of your complaint regarding the policy cancellation and she spoke
with you regarding your concerns. She advised you that due to the year your
property was built it would require an inspection and she provided the
allowance for you to take your own photos. Once they were received, in effort
to reinstate your homeowners policy, [redacted] immediately escalated the
issue to our senior management team, where [redacted], Business
Development Manager, submitted an exception request to our Underwriting Team but,
regrettably, after careful consideration it was determined that the declination
would stand, due to the property’s proximity to brush. Please accept our
sincere apologies for the frustration you may have experienced throughout this
ordeal. At the time of binding, [redacted] thoroughly reviewed your property and
did not consider your home to be unacceptable. Ultimately, it is our
Underwriting Department that has the final decision regarding coverage
eligibility and it was concluded that we were unable to reinstate coverage due
to the brush exposure. Specifically, underwriting guidelines considers a
distance of less than 1,000 feet between a property and brush to be a risk
liability for the Exchange, and thus an excluding factor for maintaining
coverage. Please know it was never [redacted]’s intention to mislead you in any
way. Should you have any questions, please contact [redacted]
[redacted] ext. [redacted].
Review: I purchased this auto policy on 3/31/2015. I paid $147.00 which was expressed as being two months premium. On 4/16/2015, I made a change to the policy deleting one vehicle, and adding another which was leased so it increased the premium significantly. I immediately obtained a quote from my former insurance company [redacted] at a much lower rate, and on 4/23 I cancelled this policy with AAA. Even with the increase in the premium from adding a leased vehicle needing higher coverage, there were only a few days of that coverage, so according to my calculations, they would actually owe me for the second month of coverage that I had already paid. When I disputed it, they termed it as a cancellation fee, which I've never heard of in my 40 years of driving, nor did anyone disclose that possibility (as far fetched as it is) to me. I don't even think it is legal to charge that type of fee for car insurance. They are indicating that I owe $82 which I do not. They owe ME money. I NEVER get a returned phone call and I've called the number on the correspondence many times and left voicemails. I am wondering if this person exists [redacted]. Supposedly, he is the collections supervisor. Now I am being offered a "settlement amount" of $65.60. Again, THEY OWE ME MONEY, not the other way around. They are now threatening to send to a collection agency and I think that is illegal since I'm getting NO RESPONSE from them when I call them. "[redacted]" phone number listed is [redacted] or [redacted]. No matter when I call, never getting through, never receive a returned call. The date on the letter is 9/2/2015 and they are giving me 10 business days to respond with payment or it goes to collection. I just got the letter today, 9/5/2015.Desired Settlement: I am seeking the appropriate details and refund of amount paid but not fully utilized since the policy was cancelled in less than 30 days.
Business
Response:
[redacted] filed similar complaints with the California
Department of Insurance (CDI). Response to complaints is as follows: Your
insurance coverage was provided by the Interinsurance Exchange of the
Automobile Club (the Exchange) and was to be effective3-23-2015 until
3-23-2016. You requested the policy be cancelled on 4-24-2015 which left e
balance of $82.00. In your request for assistance, you state that the Exchange
is using a short rate calculation that you were not made aware of. The Exchange
makes every effort to both verbally communicate this calculation as well
as writing. In our response to the CDI,
we included for your review the signed application where it mentioned Notice of
Short Rate Cancellation and that you agree to the terms. In an effort to ensure
a fair outcome, our Collection Supervisor agreed to accept a $20.00 payment
from you to close this issue and you agreed to make that payment. If you have
any further questions, please contact [redacted] at 714-850-5581.
Review: For the last 3 months (since 9/2013) I have been asking the Automobile Club of Southern California Auto Insurance to: 1) remove my daughter from the insurance plan. ( I even went in person to the AAA office in Santa Monica to sign the paper required to remove my daughter from the insurance policy.And 2) And they (AAA Insurance) have failed to reimburse me the money and reduce the annual premium as they verbally have promised on the numerous occasions I called. Not only AAA did not do as promised, they renewed my 2014 Insurance Policy, disregarding my request to remove my daughter from the policy. I accuse them of willful neglect, that benefits them by charging me more money for an insurance premium I am trying to reduce.Desired Settlement: 1) remove my daughter from the auto insurance plan.2)reimburse me the money and reduce the annual premium as they verbally have promised on the numerous occasions.
Business
Response:
We required a signed Exclusion form to remove the driver. A signed Exclusion form was received and the elimination of the driver was processed as requested. We verified the premium is correct. If any questions, please contact our Insurance Services Department at 800-924-6141.
Review: On January 22, between 12:00 and 12:30, I had my car (2000 Toyota Corolla) repaired by your AAA Club Service Technician (No.: [redacted]) at my apartment. A new battery was installed, which works well. Unfortunately, the AAA technician broke the driver side door handle while I was away from my car getting my credit card in the apartment. When I asked him just before being handed the receipt, he said it was already like that. This is impossible because my son and I tried to start the car at 11:30, he opened the door and the handle was not broken. My son then spoke with an AAA representative [redacted] at 11:55. The AAA technician drove away at 12:30. After my son and I discussed this concretely, we concluded that it was the AAA technician because it did not occur before 12:00 nor after 12:30.Also, your technician failed to return my credit card after he handed me the receipt. When I realized he wouldn't provide with my credit card after a moment, I asked him for it.Desired Settlement: Replace the door handle for a new one promptly AND remove (dehire) that dishonest irresponsible AAA Technician (No.: [redacted]) because one cannot trust nor rely even on their staff.Also, remove the noun "Trust" from the motto "Service You Can Trust" at the [redacted] because there are no such things as "trust," "loyalty," "honesty, "morality," "ethic," "quality," and the like in business any more.
Business
Response:
In
review of the matter, Contract Station Relations Supervisor, [redacted], handled
the initial inquiry into the service that was provided by our independent
contractor, [redacted], Inc. It is our understanding that he
has investigated and reviewed the issues that were brought to our attention. Contact
was made with [redacted]s management team and your concerns regarding
the broken car door handle were addressed.
[redacted] confirmed that the handle was replaced and installed by [redacted] on February 4, 2015 to your satisfaction. In your letter
you also made mention of the attending technician and [redacted]s
honesty and your lack of trust with them. We understand that in your follow up
conversation with CSR Supervisors, [redacted] and [redacted], that this
concern was addressed and you wanted to retract those statements based on the
case handling with the owner of [redacted], [redacted]. We are
pleased to know that your confidence in one of our contract stations was
renewed. We are also pleased to inform you that this service call has been
removed from your member usage history and will not count against your annual
allotment of service calls. If we may be of assistance to you in the future,
please contact [redacted] at [redacted].
Consumer
Response:
February 14, 2015
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.This resolution is not satisfactory because AAA is not meeting the last two remaining pending actions: 2) remove that dishonest irresponsible technician from [redacted] (No.: [redacted]), and 3) remove the noun "Trust" from the [redacted] motto "Service You Can Trust" since there are no such things as "trust," "confidence," "loyalty," "honesty," "morality," "ethic," and "quality" in business any more because businesses just want to make money off customers. We do not "trust" businesses any more.Furthermore, these two statements will not retract as stated in the letter dated February 11, 2015 by AAA, and my confidence in your contract stations has not been renewed either. AAA MUST meet the above two conditions to meet my satisfaction, anger, and deception. I look forward to seeing these two actions being completed promptly.
Indignantly,
Business
Response:
It is our
understanding that [redacted] has investigated and reviewed the issues that were
brought to our attention. Contact was made with [redacted]s and your
concerns regarding the broken car door handle were addressed. We confirmed that
the handle was replaced and installed by [redacted] on
February 4, 2015. We also informed you that this service call has been removed
from your member usage history and will not count against your annual allotment
of service calls. We encourage you to please contact [redacted] at [redacted] with any further questions.
Review: I inquired on AAA for an renter insurance policy but was declined. On my previous year I have a property theft incident on one of my rental properties. The theft was reported to the police and an insurance claim was filed. The claim did not result in any insurance payout but did leave a record.. I've reach out out to AAA underwriter to inquire on the reason behind the decline, tried both contacting Joleen Murphy and her manager and left a voicemail but have not heard back from them yet..
I think the previous theft incident has no correlation with my rental insurance inquiry... There was no payout, AAA underwriter is discriminating against me when I am already a victim of my previous theft incidence. The underwrite declined for me to be insured with no good justification. We do not choose to have their house broken into so we can be identify as high risk subject for us to be insured. I felt like like the insurance underwriting guideline is to stringent in protecting their own interest leaving consumer at a greater risk.Desired Settlement: I want to speak to an underwriter, understand their underwriting criteria and have them provide me the best course of action to resolve the problem. A letter for decline follow by a refund check with no explanation is too subtle. I would not mind to have an AAA underwriter reach out to me and explain the reasoning behind the policy declination.
Business
Response:
With respect to your application for renters insurance, our records show that you visited the Auto Club’s Oceanside Branch where, on June 13, 2014, you purchased homeowners policy CH[redacted] with a coverage effective date of June 7, 2014. You were assisted by Sales Agent [redacted], who on June 18, 2014, forwarded your application together with the required forms and documents to the Underwriting Department of the Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club (the “Exchange”) for review and evaluation. During the underwriting process, Ms. [redacted], the underwriter to whom your application was assigned, noted that on July 1, 2013, you had suffered a theft loss at a different risk address. In view of the Exchange’s current underwriting acceptability criterion that states “we will not accept any prior theft and/or vandalism loss(es) related to the insured/applicant even if no payment was made,” your application was ineligible for insurance with the Exchange. Therefore, on August 1, 2014, Ms. [redacted] sent you a “Notice of Cancellation and Termination of Insurance” in which she advised you of the reason for the cancellation and that all insurance requested in your insurance application would cease at 12:01 a.m., Pacific Standard Time, on August 26, 2014. In the complaint filed with the Revdex.com, you stated that the July 1, 2013 theft loss had not resulted in any payout by your prior insurance carrier and that, in your opinion, this loss should not be taken into consideration by the Exchange. The fact that your prior insurer did not make any payments to settle this claim does not negate the fact that you sustained a theft loss. As stated above, applications from persons who have had any prior theft and/or vandalism loss(es) related to the insured/applicant, even if no payment was made, are unacceptable for insurance with the Exchange. Our records show that on September 3, 2014, you placed a call to Ms. [redacted], Underwriter, because Ms. [redacted] was out of the office. You left a voicemail message for Ms. [redacted] requesting more information about the Exchange’s underwriting guidelines. Ms. [redacted] returned your call and left you a voicemail message in which she explained the reason for the cancellation of your application. She also asked you to call her back if you had any questions. To date, you have not spoken with Ms. [redacted]. Later, on September 9, 2014, after receiving the Revdex.com complaint, and as you requested, Ms. [redacted] made two separate telephone calls to your residence. On both occasions there was no answer and she was advised that your mailbox was full and could not leave you a voicemail message. If you should have any questions, please contact Mr. [redacted], at (714) 885-1791, or Ms. [redacted], Manager at (714) 885-1411.
Review: For the past two years, AAA has listed my kitchen as Custom and has increased my rates this year by $65.00.
The kitchen is not cuts. We simply replaced 30 year old cabinets that were broke with new cabinets. The Kitchen floor, ceiling and 2/3 of the alliances are the same. Walls were not moved. Cabinets were off the shelf from the supplier. Nothing was custom made. We are retired, we can't afford custom.
When asked to disclose their determination of custom, they refused.
AAA didn't even make an onsite visit.Desired Settlement: Reduce the cost by $65.00 to reflect the real situation of the kitchen as "STANDARD".
Business
Response:
According
to our records, on February 25, 2016, you spoke with Mr. [redacted],
Underwriting Manager, regarding the classification of your kitchen as “custom”.
You provided current photos of your kitchen for his review. Upon reviewing the
photos, Mr. [redacted] has agreed to reclassify your kitchen as “semi-custom”. He
advised you of his decision and made the change to your policy effective upon
your upcoming renewal of April 13, 2016. A Policy Change Declarations has been
mailed to you for that transaction. Upon reviewing this matter further, we have
decided to backdate the reclassification of your kitchen to April 13, 2015,
which is the date it was originally changed from “semi-custom” to “custom”. You
will receive a new Policy Change Declarations for this transaction within ten
business days. If you have any questions, please contact either [redacted],
at [redacted], or [redacted] at [redacted].
Review: I called AAA on 6/7/2105 regarding vandalism on the 2007 Cadillac STS insured by me while I was in it. They could not help me with tow request as all AAA shops were closed. Left me on my own covered in glass and two windows shattered. Called the Corona police and filed a report. On 6/8/2015 called AAA to learn original claim was non-existant. Refiled claim with AAA and took car to [redacted] Explained incident with [redacted] with whom I went over all the damage including various dents on car and areas that had been kicked including the front driver quarter panel, front grill, and lights, and that I had run over a curb while fleeing in fear for my life. He said they would go over car and inspect. I advised him I ran over curb and to look for additional damage. Also the car had been kicked in various places and review the entire car. I was not asked by AAA to be present when car was first evaluated. After car was returned, we discovered car had not been cleaned and there was glass in car, in door, in the seatbelt channels, in the trunk, behind the back seats. Wrong tint style had been installed. Also scratches on non-smashed windows were missed. Other items had not been addressed by AAA or [redacted]. bringing this to their attention, I met with [redacted], AAA claims adjustor at a dealership where we reviewed the car, and I mentioned that strange electrical things were happening (e.g. the driver side mirror was adjusting on its own which related to the electrical system). Items were still not addresses and I met with another adjustor to review items. On 6/17, the fog light began to melt and smolder while my fiance was in park. A stranger banged on the window to alert him something was wrong. He had parked and been resting due to his cancer exhausting him. The electrical system could have caught on fire. I feel that AAA is neglegent for not addressing and neglecting all my concerns. I also would like to file a complaint against [redacted]Desired Settlement: I want all my issues to be addressed and not be excused. I was involved in a horrific attack and am dealing with repairing the car to its prior condition. I am being treated poorly with no concern for resolving the damages. I have contacted [redacted] regarding a refund for the non-detailing/cleaning and they will not return my calls. AAA is not seeing the bigger picture of the damage and is focused on only the window repair and the dented quarter panel (which I had to argue over.
Business
Response:
In
reviewing the Emergency Road Service (ERS) phone calls for June 7, 2015 I see
you called in at 11:32 pm explaining persons unknown to you broke the rear
glass and driver’s side window. I am glad to hear you were not physically
injured. The ERS operator explained that your 2007 Cadillac STS could either be
towed to your house or to a storage facility as repair shops were closed that
late in the evening. You advised that you would call your fiancé first and then
call back if you wanted the car towed. On June 8th you called ERS
and your car was towed to [redacted] ([redacted]). It is my
understanding that you had a conversation with [redacted] Service Writer, [redacted]
and it was agreed that he was to do a complete inspection of the Cadillac. [redacted]
is a participant in our AAA Member Preferred Repairs (MPR) Program and does not
require an appraiser to be complete the initial inspection. MPR shops are
authorized to complete the initial inspection, write an estimate to repair the
damages and begin the repair with the owner’s authorization. The Exchange would
not have asked you to be present as you had discussed the damages with Mr.
[redacted] on the phone. After Mr. [redacted]’s initial inspection he contacted AAA
Appraiser [redacted] to inspect your Cadillac. Mrs. [redacted]
inspected the vehicle on June 12th and after reviewing the damages
and facts of loss it appeared that there were two separate losses. [redacted]
completed the replacement of the glass and clean up of the broken glass and
returned the vehicle to you. I apologize for Mr. [redacted] not returning your
calls. However, Mrs. [redacted] had advised Mr. [redacted] that she would be
handling your concerns so he assumed that a return call would not be necessary.
On June 29th, Claims Manager, [redacted], had the pleasure of
speaking with you regarding the unrelated damages and additional glass clean up
as [redacted] did not clean the glass completely. You advised that you would contact [redacted] for additional clean up. At your request, Mrs.
[redacted] met with you on July 1st at Selman Chevrolet. She
addressed the following concerns that were brought to her attention.
Review: I am not sure if I picked the right reason for my complaint, but here is why I am going to you.
After 21 years with the A.A.A. of Southern California, I WAS DROPPED! I have done nothing wrong, and have NEVER missed a payment. I upgraded each time I was asked if I would like to, and used their 24 Hour Roadside Assistance just as it was offered, Never asking for more, in fact, the program I was in even had free rental car or a Hotel if stranded far, of all thoughs years, I never even used it?
But out of the blue, I get a letter stating I am CANCELLED! Reasons? Very Vague, in a page, basically a standard form, they state " your emergency roadside Assistance benefits are gone do to 1 or more of the following:
A commercial or business purpose, using towing service for customers, employees (2) towing service not related to a breakdown, accident or other covered disablement,(3) the purpose of transporting Vehicle for purchase sale, auction, car exhibition.
As I say, it’s a standard letter, not showing any reason in particular to my case. I feel I am being targeted because of the age of my cars, and that I did use what was offered, I think they are weeding out all but maybe the little old lady that may call 1 time in 10 years? Again, I have done NOTHING WRONG, and I have tried and tried to contact them, THEY REFUSE to talk about it, I went in to 3 different AAA store's and told that NO ONE will discuss this with you, you must write and Appeal it, THAT IS ONLY WAY?? So I did, and again, a generic letter with NO PROOF Of wrong doing came, and told I am cancelled.
Again, I have been with the Co. for over 21 years!!!! And did NOTHING WRONG? Please help me, and I am sure there are many others with same problem.Desired Settlement: I want my membership back? I have always liked there service, and the way I can do DMV, and I even got a letter from there Home owners insurance department? I was just going into there establishment this year to see about home owners insurance too?
I think they may have made a very bad mistake, so if I can get my membership back, I will happy to be with them another 21 years. thank you
Business
Response:
Membership was cancelled for misconduct. Notice of the cancellation that was sent
included information of reason for cancellation. [redacted] sent in an appeal
which was reviewed and the appeal denied. The response to the appeal notified
[redacted] of the decision and again included information of reasons for
cancellation.
Review: I have been a member of AAA Roadside assistance for 12 years and I've never had an issue until now. I called Thursday, 7/31/14 for battery service, the gentleman who arrived only gave me a jump start, did not give me a copy of the battery test that he ran, told me my battery was fine and left. He didn't ask me for my ID or AAA membership card, nor did I sign any paperwork. On Friday 8/1/14 I called again for battery service since my car wouldn't start. This time the technician that came was very helpful and gave me my copy of the battery test, asked for my ID and membership, etc. he was going to replace my battery when he noticed that the sticker date was removed from my battery (perhaps from the previous tech) luckily I had my receipt of the purchased battery through AAA 2 years ago, therefore my battery is under warranty for replacement. However he did not have the size adequate for my vehicle. Saturday 8/2/14 I called again for battery service and requested hat the tech please have the right size. I waited almost an hour and once the tech arrived he did not have the battery. I called AAA and asked that if the tech were to place a "compatible" battery and something were to go wrong with my vehicle, who would be liable for repairs? The Rep on the phone and the tech both said AAA would be - however that would be more of a hassle and inconvenience. Since I purchased the battery I would expect to have the same battery replaced per the warranty, after that's what I originally paid for and that is what AAA guarantees. I had to go and purchase a whole new battery that morning due to AAA not being able to fulfill their warranty.Desired Settlement: I would either like a full refund for the battery I originally purchased with AAA ($79.00) or a full refund for the battery I purchased this morning ($123.00); if AAA would of fulfilled their warranty I would not have to purchase this battery.
Business
Response:
Contract Station Relations Supervisor [redacted] handled the initial inquiry into the service that was provided by our independent contractor, United Towing and Transport, Inc. It is our understanding that he has fully investigated and reviewed the issues that were brought to our attention. Mr. [redacted]’ conversation with you revealed that you are seeking a reimbursement for the failed AAA battery you purchased from our Independent Contractor Classic Club Service, Inc. on August 25, 2012. Our AAA Battery warranty policy protocol is to replace failed batteries in the field. Unfortunately in this situation, United Towing and Transport Inc did not have the specific battery available for your vehicle as it is not a high demand model that is frequently used. The technician did offer an acceptable alternate battery, which you opted not to use. Please be assured that we have followed up with the United Towing management team to review your complaint in order for them to handle this type of situation in a more proactive manner. This would alleviate the need for our members to make multiple service requests as the matter would be resolved immediately. Disciplinary action was taken in order to preclude this situation from recurring again in the future. We appreciate your feedback as this allows us the opportunity to ensure our independent contractors are providing the high level of service you’ve come to expect from the Auto Club. We are pleased that Mr. [redacted] has offered to reimburse you the full purchase price for the replacement battery from Pep Boys. We have also removed all of the calls related to this incident from your member usage history, leaving you with 4 calls available on your membership until the expiration date of March 16, 2015. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Mr. [redacted] at (818) 562-8564.
Review: In mid-December, I called AAA for a quote for my home, earthquake, cars, boat, camper and umbrella. I spoke with [redacted] at [redacted] extension [redacted]. In the very first conversation with him, I told him I wanted to make sure that AAA would cover my home, before moving forward with anything. He checked my address and said it would not be an issue for any brush concerns. I then proceeded to cancel all my other insurance and moved it to AAA. I received a letter from them on 2/9/2014 saying that they had canceled my home and earthquake insurances as of 2/5/2014. I emailed [redacted] immediately upon receiving it and he said that the company could not do that. I worked with him and [redacted] extension [redacted] for 3 weeks to see how this could be possible. In the end, they said they could not do anything for me. I have now been out of insurance and they are doing insurance practices that are not legal. How can you cancel me after explicit discussions on this and with no notice!Desired Settlement: Reinstate the insurance; compensate me for the hours of time working on this issue and reprimand / revoke [redacted]’s license.
Business
Response:
Please accept our apologies for any frustration
you have experienced. Our agent submitted your application to our Underwriting
Management for review in effort to insure your property. However, due to proximity
to brush adjacent to your home, Underwriting could not make an exception to
insure your property. Regrettably, your property
cannot be insured by the Exchange at this time due to our underwriting
guidelines. We appreciate your bringing this to our attention as this provides
us with the opportunity to review our internal processes and improve our overall
member service. If you have any questions, please contact [redacted] at
[redacted].
Review: I insured my own Vehicle [redacted] model year 2004 [ VEHICLE I.D. [redacted]] ON DATE 4/14/2015 EXP.4/14/2016 [ full cover insurance policy] with the insurance company: Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile CLUB [redacted] AND I DID PAID THE PREMIUM
PAYMENT OF US.$221.00 RECEIPT NO.[redacted] [FULL CVERAGE INSURANCE POLICY NO.[redacted]].
THEN THE SECOND DAY [redacted] FROM THE INSURANCE COMPANY INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB, [redacted] BRANCH CALLING MY PHONE ASKING FOR MY CORRECT ADDRESS, OTHERWISE HE WELL CANCELL THE POLICY, ALTHOUGH HE GOT A COPY FROM MY CA DRIVER LICENSE.
THEN I RECEIVED NOTICE OF CANCELLATION AND TERMINATION OF INSURANCE DATE APRIL 22,2015 AFTER I FILLED THE CLAIM NO. [redacted].
CAME ON THEIR NOTICE DATED 4/22/2015 THAT : [AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION , WE MUST INFORM YOU THAT WE CANNOT INSURE YOU AT THIS TIME BECAUSE YOU HAVE NOT PROVIDED US WITH YOUR COMPLETE ADDRESS. REVIEW OF YOUR APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO THE EXCHANGE'S UNDERWRITING GUIDELINES OF ACCEPTABILITY OF INSURANCE. THEREFORE , ALL INSURANCE COVERAGES REQUESTED IN THE ABOVE APPLICATION WILL TERMINATE IN THEIR ENTIREETY ON THE DATE AND TIME MAY 13,2015
TIME 12:01 AM].
I DID FILED A COMPLAIN WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ON MAY 7, 2015 FILE NO.[redacted] IT'S UNDER PROCESSING , BUT MY VEHICLE WITHOUT INSURANCE COVERAGE , WHICH IS CONSIDER WRONG AND UNEITHICAL ACT FROM THE AAA CLUB INSURANCE COMPANY , WHICH IS UNAPPROPRIATE AND UNACCEPTABLE.Desired Settlement: THE INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB NAIC NO.[redacted].
NEEDS IMMEDIATLEY RETURN MY INSURANCE FULL COVERAGE POLICY NO.[redacted]
FREE OF CHARGE FOR ONE YEAR ON MY OWN VEHICLE [redacted] 2004 I.D.[redacted] AND REPAIR ALL DAMAGES ON THE VEHICLE MY CLAIM NO.[redacted], OTHERWISE A SEROIUS LEGAL ACTION WELL BE TAKEN AGAINST THE COMPANY OUR SUBJECT IMMEDIATLEY.
Business
Response:
We
understand that you requested a quote for auto insurance in our [redacted] branch.
We apologize if you perceived for any reason the service you received was unacceptable.
That is not how we strive to provide legendary service. We also apologize for
any miscommunication and inconvenience you experienced during this process. Per
our underwriting guidelines it is the requirement to have a primary address
listed for our insureds. When a new policy is written we have a seven day
window to provide this information to an underwriter. Because that information
was not received within that time is why you received the cancellation email
from our underwriters. It is our understanding that since your correct and
complete address was not received that your policy has been canceled and a full
refund issued. If you have any questions or concerns please contact [redacted] at
[redacted].
Review: I had a auto policy with AAA and always paid my bill on time. In April I requested additional person added to the policy. I never received a amended policy with the additional person then at the end of June I received an amended policy with the cost of the policy so I called AAA and canceled the policy because it was too expense. The policy was back dated and I was changed unfairly. I requested a itemized statement. It shows in the statement that by policy was back dated and I am being charged $230.34. When I called the representative he indicated that I would get the updated policy with a week which I never received until after the fact which was 3 months later. I feel I am being charged for a policy that I never received and as far as I was concerned was never active. How can I owe 230 dollars for a policy that is 834 dollars for 6 months. The last bill I received from AAA was June and it was the old policy amount. I paid the amount and it was accepted. The amount that I was billed was the old policy so I understood that the additional person was not added. I paid the amount due which was cashed by AAA on June 13, 2014. Then I received an amended policy June 26 due on 7/31 so I canceled the policy before the due date. Attached is their itemized statement. Now they are threating to send me to collection.Desired Settlement: That I not be charged for a product I did not receive. I do not owe the money.
Business
Response:
A review of our records reflects that on February 12, 2014, we mailed you the renewal of your auto policy effective March 25, 2014. The renewal was offered at an annual premium of $358.00 with an earned policyholder’s savings dividend of $25.00, making your net premium $333.00. On April 26, 2014, you added your son [redacted]. Based on the activity on his motor vehicle record, the completion of the transaction required additional approval. On June 26, 2014, the transaction adding [redacted] to your policy completed. This change resulted in a prorated premium increase of $846.00 and a new annual premium of $1,286.00. We apologize for our delay in completing the transaction which added your son to your policy. Be assured that occurrences such as these are not our usual and customary way of conducting business. We fully investigated your concerns and took appropriate action to ensure no further incidents of this nature recur. While we acknowledge the completion of the transaction took additional time, please know that coverage was provided for [redacted] from April 26, 2014. On July 31, 2014, at your request the policy was cancelled. Based on the coverage provided and payments we received, you currently have an outstanding balance owed of $230.34. Below is a calculation of the earned premium on the policy.
Review: License#: [redacted]
To Whom it May Concern:
I am a homeowner, this June, I decided to change my insurance carrier to AAA. The above broker asked me a series of questions which I answered entirely truthfully, and represented to me that he was in a position to meet or exceed my current policy at the same price.
The one request the broker made was that an inspector come on site to verify the property features. The inspector did choose not to enter the crawl space to verify the bolting of the whom because the space was dark and she did not have ambient light (she arrives later in the day that originally anticipated). However, she reported that the property looked great, she saw no impediments and if there were any I would here from the agent immediately if there were any concerns.
I heard nothing from the Agent, instead I received a letter dated August 7th though not delivered until the last week of August informing me of imminent cancellation of the policy (Sept 1) due to my failure to make remedies on what they claimed were established request to remove veins and retrofit the property.
The above agent made no attempt to contact me, there are no communication short of the cancellation letter whatsoever asking me for the above remedies. To date, there is no conversation or documentation other than the cancellation of such a communication.
AAA and its broker have jeopardized the security of my home and its mortgage due to his failure to communicate and seems unfit to continue in his present position as a licensed broker.
Sincerely,
[redacted]Desired Settlement: AAA needs to honor its contract (I may choose to use another insurer due to their poor quality but the policy should be continued indefinitely to allow me time to do so over a period of months)
The agent should be sanctioned
I should receive an additional discount for my hardship
Business
Response:
I would like to take this opportunity to extend my apologies for the frustration you have experienced during the purchase of your homeowners insurance policy with our agent, Mr. [redacted]. It is our understanding that you have been in contact with us several times after recently having received a Notice of Cancellation letter from our Underwriting Department, in effort to obtain the reason for receiving such notice. On August 29, 2014, you received the cancellation letter with an effective date of September 1, 2014. That same day, you contacted Mr. [redacted] to express your dissatisfaction with his lack of communication with you regarding Underwriting’s decision on your property. Mr. [redacted] then apologized for any miscommunication and informed you that either he, himself, or an underwriter would be in contact with you regarding the outcome of the inspection. Mr. [redacted] then explained to you that due to the decorative vine coverage of your home, as well as being unable to provide proof of retrofitting, the cancellation letter was in order, unless both qualifications were remedied. At that time, Mr. [redacted] provided you with options to maintain your coverage. You then mentioned that due to the late notice of the cancellation letter, it could also jeopardize the insurance requirement with your mortgage lender. Mr. [redacted], Business Development Manager, spoke with you regarding the status of your homeowners policy and with Underwriting Management in effort to obtain an exception, so as to extend your coverage with us to allow you to find a new carrier. Unfortunately, our Underwriting Department was not able to provide an exception. This is specifically due to the two matters of concern not satisfying our Underwriting guidelines. It is also our understanding that you stated to Mr. Harris you would not consider making the specified adjustments to your property. In addition, our records indicate that Underwriter, Mr. Austin Manry, called you on August 5, 2014 to inform you of the status of your policy, but was unsuccessful in speaking with you. Our system shows that the Notice of Cancellation was also mailed out to you that same day. In compliance with
Review: On January 17, 2014 I was involved in a car accident. Because I'm a AAA member I called them to tow my [redacted] pick-up truck. When I called AAA I was asked if I was involved in a accident which I replied "yes". AAA was at the scene 30 minutes before the City of [redacted] tow trucks arrived but weren't allowed to tow my truck because the tow truck sent did not have the proper certification to tow vehicles from accident scenes. In my research I discovered the in the [redacted] tow trucks must be IM (Incident Management) certified to tow a vehicle from the scene of an accident. The tow truck sent was ** ([redacted]) certified which is not permitted to tow from accidents. Because the proper tow truck was not sent the police on the scene did not allow my truck to be towed by AAA. The total cost for my vehicle to be released from the [redacted] Police Autopound was $322.55. I contacted AAA and explained the situation in writing and they sent me a check for $121.00 which was the cost of the tow only. I feel the total cost should be reimbursed because if the proper tow truck had been sent, this would have avoided the auto pound fees.Desired Settlement: A refund in the amount of 201.55 for auto pound fees.
Business
Response:
Case # [redacted] Simms Member confirmed the Police were on scene prior to the arrival of the AAA Towing provider. We are required to follow direction from Police on scene, the police turned away the AAA tow truck driver. Member was provided AAA Club cost for the towing services under the terms of his membership. We advised the member he could contact his insurance provider for possible reimbursement consideration and member refused.
Review: Hi
I saw a ad on channel [redacted] I decided to purchase aaa membership fo me and for my wife 8/9/2015 @2.17 pm I call [redacted] phone was picked up by gentleman named [redacted] after I gave my information he mention I cant open a membership because membership dept has put a block on me and my wife because of previous membership we had 12 years they cancelled because we use the service.this is not fair and not reasonable I dont mind they collect money they have to give some service too.they are targeting specific people to rip off or they are fair to everybodyDesired Settlement: I would like me and my wife get the aaa membership back
Business
Response:
The original membership
(#[redacted]) that [redacted] had with the Automobile Club of Southern
California (“Auto Club”) was cancelled by the Auto Club for membership abuse
and misconduct in 2013, with direction that no further memberships would be
permitted and that [redacted] should not apply for any membership with the Auto
Club in the future. [redacted] appealed this cancellation and Auto Club’s
Appeals Committee denied the appeal. In addition, since being cancelled
on that original membership, the primary member, [redacted], was cancelled
from an Adult Associate role on another membership (#[redacted]). Most
recently, [redacted] apparently managed to improperly open another
membership with the Auto Club (#[redacted]), which was thereafter cancelled
once Auto Club discovered the improper membership had been established. Due to their history of membership abuse, the
[redacted] have been cancelled as Auto Club members and advised that they may not
return. While the Auto Club may advertise for new members, all new
members must meet the membership requirements and if they have been previously
cancelled as members due to abuse or misconduct, they are not entitled to
obtain a new membership. This policy is consistently applied by the Auto
Club toward all new memberships.
Review: I signed paperwork that set my home insurance at $495 and auto insurance at $741. My agent, [redacted], said he would contact my previous insurance to get it cancelled, contact the mortgage company to notify them about the change of insurance and set up auto pay through my escrow acccount. I paid for my auto insurance that day, in full, with my credit card. A few days later, I received my AAA auto insurance paperwork in the mail. The auto insurance had increased to $797 (8% increase) and the home insurance increased to $659 (33% increase). No home/car inspection had been conducted at this time and no explanation was given regarding the increase. My previous insurance e had still not been cancelled nor had my mortgage company been notified of the insurance change. I spoke with [redacted] on the phone and said he would get everything fixed shortly. Nothing was fixed. The mortgage company called me a few days later saying I had no insurance coverage on my house and my previous insurance agent was never notified of the change. Over the next several weeks, I exchanged several emails and phone calls with the agent continuing to say that it would be fixed soon (all broken promises). The agent said it was his error that caused the price increase. AAA then sent me a notice in my mail that I did not submit the signed paperwork...but it was my agent's fault for not giving the underwriting service the paperwork I signed. After several additional emails and getting his manager involved, the auto was finally fixed to match the originally quoted $741. At this time, the home insurance is still not fixed (even with the manager's assistance). The agent did not keep any of his promises...I had to take care of everything.Desired Settlement: I would like:
-My home insurance corrected to match the originally quoted amount ($495) which I have already paid in full.
-Both the auto and home insurance price adjusted to compensate for the the previous insurance not being cancelled immediately by the AAA agent (I was double covered from 1/24 to 2/11). The previous insurance company could not re-adjust the cancellation date.
-A written apology from AAA insurance explaining why there were so many delays and why I was billed a different amount from what was on the signed paperwork.
-A detailed action plan stating how they will prevent these discrepancies and delays from happening in the future.
Business
Response:
It
is our understanding that you spoke with our agent, Mr. [redacted], who
assisted you with the purchase of an auto and homeowners insurance policy. During
the auto quotation process it was indicated that you were first licensed in
2004; however, upon processing your application it was discovered that your
California Driver’s License was first issued in 2006 which caused a change in
the auto insurance premium to $797.00. Mr. [redacted] advised that he reviewed
this change with you and the rate change was accepted. In relation to your
homeowner’s policy, Mr. [redacted] calculated the dwelling replacement cost
(Coverage A) based off of your prior policy with State Farm, resulting in a
quote for the amount of $495.00. After the policy was bound, Insurance to Value
analysis was completed for your property and the findings revealed that based
on the features of your home the correct dwelling coverage amount was $277,000.
This resulted in the new premium of $695.00 whereupon you contacted Mr.
[redacted] regarding the premium difference. Mr. [redacted] confirmed that an
adjustment would be made to match the original policy amount. Ms. [redacted],
Insurance Business Manager, spoke with you on April 9, 2015 regarding your
premium increase as well as policy coverage. She explained that we honored your
request, and issued you the difference in premium of $164.00 for your
homeowner’s policy, which processed on April 13, 2015. Ms. [redacted] also apologized
for your many inconveniences throughout this situation and for our agent’s
error as well as addressed the need to cancel your policies with your previous
insurance carrier to avoid double coverage. Your concerns have been fully
investigated and appropriate action was taken to help ensure no further
incidents of this nature occur in the future. Should you have any questions,
please contact [redacted] at 866-714-6313 Ext. [redacted].
Review: Car insurance was changed from full coverage to liability only without request, permission, or knowledge of the policy holder. Company claimed to have sent postal mail regarding change which was not received by policy holder. Company has refused full coverage after auto accident.Desired Settlement: Request of repair of vehicle as covered by insurance policy that policy holder believed to have at time of accident.
Business
Response:
You
express dissatisfaction with the cancellation of the Collision, Comprehensive,
and Rental coverages for the [redacted]. It is our understanding that
[redacted], Claims Team Manager, called to address your concerns but was
unable to reach you. We make every effort to promptly, consistently and fairly
resolve all claims. We have researched our records regarding coverage for the
above referenced loss. On March 31, 2014, a letter was sent to your address of
record indicating that an inspection of your [redacted] was required by
Underwriting. The letter further noted that if the inspection was not completed
within 30 days, the physical damage coverages would be cancelled. As mandated
and in compliance with California Department of Insurance regulations, a notice
of “Cancellation of Coverage” letter was sent to your address of record on May
14, 2014. This notice informed you that due to your failure to comply with our
request for a vehicle inspection for the [redacted], the physical damage
coverages will be cancelled effective June 4, 2014. An inspection was not
provided and the Collision, Comprehensive, and Rental coverages were cancelled
effective June 4, 2014. After careful
review of the information available to us, we regret to confirm that our
position on this matter has not changed. We are unable to provide Collision,
Comprehensive, and Rental coverages for the
[redacted] for the occurrence of January 5, 2015. Should you wish
to provide additional information for consideration that might influence our
decision, please contact [redacted] at [redacted].
Consumer
Response:
I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted], and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint. For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below.
The insurance company's response offered no change and accept no responsibility for the policy change without confirmed notice.
Regards,
Review: I signed an automobile insurance agreement for $1008.00 with [redacted], Insurance Agent, on January 15, 2014 IN GOOD FAITH. On the same day, I left a $ 201.00 deposit (check no. 8144) on the one year insurance policy. On January 24, 2014, I received a new bill, signed by Robert T. Bouttier, CEO showing a premium amount for $1233.00. I requested an explanation for the increase. The answer was that I had to show proof of our highest education diploma. I did. Automobile Club gave me a discount for $ 72.00 dollars. The discount, however, still did not bring the total premium amount to $1008.00. I continuously asked for further explanation, a line item break down of the monthly payments that are based on a 10 month schedule.
I made the monthly payments in good faith until the month of June. In the month of June, I still did not receive an invoice showing the monthly payments for 10 months, neither the interest that AAA is charging and should have been shown separately from the insurance premium.
As of today, I did not receive a line item by line item invoice for the 10 month time period.
I received an additional bill for $172.00.
As of July 25, 2014, I cancelled my policy with the AAA for lack of responsiveness, lack of customer service, lack of best management practices and unreliable supervisors, managers.Desired Settlement: For AAA to provide a precise break down of its charges totaling up to $ 1008.00 for a one-year policy period, based on the 10 -month monthly payment calculation, showing the interest amount separately.
Thank you for this opportunity, for your services to the consumers. [redacted]
Business
Response:
We received a similar inquiry from the California Department of Insurance. Our response is as follows. We would like to begin by commenting on your statement that the Exchange should disclose to applicants that the finance charge is a monthly charge rather than a one-time charge. In regard to this issue, our sales agents are required to advise applicants of the finance charge prior to binding an auto insurance policy. Mr. [redacted], the sales agent who assisted you with your application, followed standard procedure and prior to binding coverage explained the finance charge and followed up by sending you a folder titled “Your Auto Insurance Documents,” (copy of pertinent page enclosed) that provided you with the following information.