Aurora Christian Center

We do evangelize and leave fliers on doors. We also have different workers that LEAD the outreaches and I can see how the same area could be evangelized twice, which led to complaint that was filed. We do not have a map outlined or a list of places already covered so again I can see how the...

complaintant could have been approached twice. We will do all we can do to not make the same mistake again. I saw the address attached on the conplaint and I assure you we will do our best to avoid that place of residence. I can honestly say that I dont know if this is a legitimate complaint, or just a angry soul, but please note again we will avoid the home of the complaintant. Thank you, and please reply. [redacted]

Complaint: [redacted]
I am rejecting this response because:
The good, old U.S. of A was founded on the principle of freedom of choice.  A fundamental part of the new world order is the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment which affords citizens the RIGHT to practice his or her own religion of their choice, or no religion at all. Religious organizations such as Aurora Christian Center are expected to be part of the solution. Sadly, due to this chronic negative experience, Complainant is convinced that the church is part of the problem for the daily strife many citizens face.  To be clear, Complainant posted a large No Solicitation sign which is directed at many causes, including religious organizations. Complainant also reached out directly to Aurora Christian Center on June 1, 2016 via U.S. mail AND email to request that they pay attention to her No Solicitation sign.  They did NOT have the human decency to respond.  During the last visit that prompted this complaint to the Revdex.com, Aurora Christian Center engaged in obnoxious conduct by placing their objectionable brochure directly above Complainant’s No Solicitation Sign.  It strongly demonstrates ARROGANT, INCONSIDERATE conduct.  Complainant expected secular businesses to be disrespectful.  Ironically, they (secular businesses) have shown more respect to Complainant’s personal liberties, than Aurora Christian Center, which has consistently thumb their nose at Complainant’s sign.  It is a testament that the church is being run more like a commercial business, resulting in control freaks overstepping their authority and abusing the fundamental rights of others. When it came time for Complainant to move, she specifically selected the current property where she now resides because of the No Solicitation sign that management also posted at the front gate.  See attached. Despite encountering TWO (2) No Solicitation signs, it is clear that the rules and constitutional principles do not apply to Aurora Christian Center.  Furthermore, it is never okay to force religious propaganda and beliefs on the community, especially, if previously notified that this household does not appreciate the attempt to “evangelize” without regard to their personal liberties.  The idea that Aurora Christian Ctr would engage in name calling by referring to the Complainant as an “angry soul” is TROUBLING and DISTASTEFUL.   If the shoe was on the other foot, Complainant does not believe they would appreciate it if Complainant left objectionable content at their church door. It is a world gone crazy, which is in turmoil because people do not respect the rights of others;  and, yes, even the church. Complainant also observed that the hallway and parking lot are littered with their flyers after visiting. Obviously, other residents are also offended.   Religious organizations could serve Jesus, their church and their families better if they used good business principles to manage their time, energy and resources more efficiently.  Complainant fails to see how Aurora Christian Center can accomplish these objectives by consistently being the unwanted house guest.The lack of good manners is also evident when Aurora Christian Center questioned whether  this is a “legitimate complainant” – a suggestion that they are not taking Complainant seriously. (Indeed, they have not). The reality is that a prominently displayed No Solicitation sign deserves due regard.  By its very nature, the conduct of Aurora Christian Center is outrageously offensive. The philosophy and culture of a church is not only reflected by the services it offers, but by the way they treat others when a problem is called to their attention. The honorable way to resolve a dispute is to render a sincere, heartfelt apology, make a good faith effort not to re-offend and move on.  Aurora Christian Center's response is void of an apology, and, given the hurtful comments noted in their response, no apology would be good enough at this point.As such, Complainant communicated her concerns directly to property management regarding the chronic problems.  The Complaint is firm in her resolute that she does NOT want strangers hanging around her front door.  If the issue persists, Complainant is prepared to have her day in court.  Finally, if Complainant was seeking to experience the transforming power of “religion”, she certainly would not be knocking on the door of Aurora Christian Center.    Sincerely, 
[redacted]