[redacted] W [redacted] St San Diego CA [redacted] RE: Complaint ID [redacted] [redacted] Revdex.com Viewridge Ave # San Diego, CA 92123- 858-496- Dear [redacted] , I am in receipt of your recent email correspondence [att#1]Honestly, I am perplexed that you are requesting more supporting documentsI am concerned (1) that my response to the Revdex.com of [redacted] [att#2] was misplaced or, that, if it was not misplaced, (2) that there has been no response from the contractor Accordingly, I herewith resubmit my response, together with the following supporting documents: Correspondence of [redacted] to contractor’s attorney [att#3] Inspection Results, from Industry Expert, [redacted] Consulting [att#4] Bid to remediate from [redacted] Painting [att#5] Bid to remediate from King of Painters [att#6] Bid to remediate from Able Sandblasting [att#7] Original Contract and Payment Statements [att#8] Per pages & of my response to you at the Revdex.com of [redacted] , my analysis is that the most cost effective and best result to remediate will be to (a) have the railings sandblasted (stripped) clean and resurfaced by the sandblasting company, Able Sandblasting and (b) have the decks recoated and the office door re-prepped and repainted by King of Painters Finally, to answer your question, “why the issues mentioned in the complaint are not resolved” ~ that is because the contractor failed, twice to perform with work product as agreed and at suitable qualityThe contractor ignored constraints against the use of sprayPaint was sprayed on solar panelsUpon returning to remediate, the contractor failed to protect the decks from splatter and oversprayHaving failed at remediating issues that had been patiently explained to the contractor, after the time for completion of the contract had passed, with great exasperation I decided NOT to allow him to return for a third attemptI offered to release him from liability if he would just go away and not expect further paymentsInstead, I received a letter from his attorney Now that I have gone to the trouble of soliciting an expert opinion, of dialoging with the contractor’s attorney, of obtaining three bids and determining what might be the best path to remediate the problems caused by this contractor, Don’t Blink Painting, I opine that the ONLY resolution will be for the contractor to pay me for the expense of remediation, which per my analysis will require a payment of $to me from the contractor IE: $5, total contract, less back-charges of $2,= $3,allowable for portions of the work (power wash house and paint fascia) adequately performed But I have allowed the $5,figure to stand, and am willing to subtract from my sum of all costs to remediate (which includes expense to clean solar panels) which total $6,This leaves the contractor owing me $ IF I were to go ballistic, I would not allow the total contract figure to stand, would compute my damages from the figure of $3,(allowable for portions of the work adequately performed), and DEMAND that the contractor pay me $ I believe that I have been reasonable and fairI now would appreciate the Revdex.com’s assistance in a successful resolution of this mess Sincerely, [redacted] Attachments: 1-
[redacted] W [redacted] St San Diego CA [redacted] RE: Complaint ID [redacted] [redacted] Revdex.com Viewridge Ave # San Diego, CA 92123- 858-496- Dear [redacted] , I am in receipt of your recent email correspondence [att#1]Honestly, I am perplexed that you are requesting more supporting documentsI am concerned (1) that my response to the Revdex.com of [redacted] [att#2] was misplaced or, that, if it was not misplaced, (2) that there has been no response from the contractor Accordingly, I herewith resubmit my response, together with the following supporting documents: Correspondence of [redacted] to contractor’s attorney [att#3] Inspection Results, from Industry Expert, [redacted] Consulting [att#4] Bid to remediate from [redacted] Painting [att#5] Bid to remediate from King of Painters [att#6] Bid to remediate from Able Sandblasting [att#7] Original Contract and Payment Statements [att#8] Per pages & of my response to you at the Revdex.com of [redacted] , my analysis is that the most cost effective and best result to remediate will be to (a) have the railings sandblasted (stripped) clean and resurfaced by the sandblasting company, Able Sandblasting and (b) have the decks recoated and the office door re-prepped and repainted by King of Painters Finally, to answer your question, “why the issues mentioned in the complaint are not resolved” ~ that is because the contractor failed, twice to perform with work product as agreed and at suitable qualityThe contractor ignored constraints against the use of sprayPaint was sprayed on solar panelsUpon returning to remediate, the contractor failed to protect the decks from splatter and oversprayHaving failed at remediating issues that had been patiently explained to the contractor, after the time for completion of the contract had passed, with great exasperation I decided NOT to allow him to return for a third attemptI offered to release him from liability if he would just go away and not expect further paymentsInstead, I received a letter from his attorney Now that I have gone to the trouble of soliciting an expert opinion, of dialoging with the contractor’s attorney, of obtaining three bids and determining what might be the best path to remediate the problems caused by this contractor, Don’t Blink Painting, I opine that the ONLY resolution will be for the contractor to pay me for the expense of remediation, which per my analysis will require a payment of $to me from the contractor IE: $5, total contract, less back-charges of $2,= $3,allowable for portions of the work (power wash house and paint fascia) adequately performed But I have allowed the $5,figure to stand, and am willing to subtract from my sum of all costs to remediate (which includes expense to clean solar panels) which total $6,This leaves the contractor owing me $ IF I were to go ballistic, I would not allow the total contract figure to stand, would compute my damages from the figure of $3,(allowable for portions of the work adequately performed), and DEMAND that the contractor pay me $ I believe that I have been reasonable and fairI now would appreciate the Revdex.com’s assistance in a successful resolution of this mess Sincerely, [redacted] Attachments: 1-