Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below Regards, [redacted] They are claiming they only called once however that is false There were several phone calls made to our home and messages left
Phone call with customer 2/2/4:54PM PT:Customer was mistaken and thought Culver had been calling him at 10PM at nightHe was informed that Culver had only called him once at 9:PT on 1/28/and per his request would not be calling again.This complaint should be removed as created by mistakeThank you
I spoke with the customer today and discussed that this complaint was filed by mistake as he was unaware of the financing termsAny misunderstanding has been resolvedThank you
This company was contacted by Culver Capital twice on 6/12/and 8/1/14.On the second call our Culver's representative spoke with the manager who said no fiancing requirements existed and asked that no further calls be made to their officeThis was noted in Culver's phone system and no contacts have been made to this business since
[redacted] applied for $600,of financing with Culver CapitalAs a part of Culver’s standard credit review process, information was requested related to the financial health of the applicant, including existence of any open liens or judgements currently against the applicantThe applicant represented there were not such open liens or judgementsFollowing acceptance of a financing proposal, underwriting determined there were various open derogatory public records precluding final credit approval with proof of satisfaction Information regarding the specific nature and status of such derogatory public fillings was requested but never received by CulverIn lieu of providing such information, client elected to cancel their financing requestPer the terms of the agreed proposal terms the client would then also be electing to forfeit their financing depositTo avoid such an occurrence, Culver has attempted to in contact with [redacted] to pursue possible acceptable alternativesTo date, the customer has been unresponsive to any attempt to bring about a negotiated resolution to this matter
Response: black;"> The same week this customer filed this complaint, the matter had been resolved and a refund as the customer requested had been providedDue to a final credit approval not being made available, this customer’s advance payment deposit was refunded in full
[redacted] LLC applied for $600,000of financing with Culver CapitalAs a part of Culver’s standard credit reviewprocess, information was requested related to the financial health of theapplicant, including existence of any open liens or judgements currentlyagainst the applicantThe applicant represented there were not such open liensor judgementFollowing acceptance of a financing proposal, underwriting determinedthe following: Derogatory public filings (open judgments for $5,and 9open tax liens for $149, Information regarding the specific natureand status of such derogatory public fillings was requested but never receivedby CulverIn lieu of providing such information, client has elected to cancelsuch financing requestPer the terms of the agreed proposal terms the clientwould then also be electing to forfeit their financing depositTo avoid such anoccurrence, Culver has been in contact with [redacted] LLC topursue possible acceptable alternatives
Revdex.com: I have reviewed the response made by the business in reference to complaint ID [redacted] , and have determined that this proposed action would not resolve my complaint For your reference, details of the offer I reviewed appear below Regards, [redacted] They are claiming they only called once however that is false There were several phone calls made to our home and messages left
Phone call with customer 2/2/4:54PM PT:Customer was mistaken and thought Culver had been calling him at 10PM at nightHe was informed that Culver had only called him once at 9:PT on 1/28/and per his request would not be calling again.This complaint should be removed as created by mistakeThank you
I spoke with the customer today and discussed that this complaint was filed by mistake as he was unaware of the financing termsAny misunderstanding has been resolvedThank you
This company was contacted by Culver Capital twice on 6/12/and 8/1/14.On the second call our Culver's representative spoke with the manager who said no fiancing requirements existed and asked that no further calls be made to their officeThis was noted in Culver's phone system and no contacts have been made to this business since
[redacted] applied for $600,of financing with Culver CapitalAs a part of Culver’s standard credit review process, information was requested related to the financial health of the applicant, including existence of any open liens or judgements currently against the applicantThe applicant represented there were not such open liens or judgementsFollowing acceptance of a financing proposal, underwriting determined there were various open derogatory public records precluding final credit approval with proof of satisfaction Information regarding the specific nature and status of such derogatory public fillings was requested but never received by CulverIn lieu of providing such information, client elected to cancel their financing requestPer the terms of the agreed proposal terms the client would then also be electing to forfeit their financing depositTo avoid such an occurrence, Culver has attempted to in contact with [redacted] to pursue possible acceptable alternativesTo date, the customer has been unresponsive to any attempt to bring about a negotiated resolution to this matter
Response: black;"> The same week this customer filed this complaint, the matter had been resolved and a refund as the customer requested had been providedDue to a final credit approval not being made available, this customer’s advance payment deposit was refunded in full
[redacted] LLC applied for $600,000of financing with Culver CapitalAs a part of Culver’s standard credit reviewprocess, information was requested related to the financial health of theapplicant, including existence of any open liens or judgements currentlyagainst the applicantThe applicant represented there were not such open liensor judgementFollowing acceptance of a financing proposal, underwriting determinedthe following: Derogatory public filings (open judgments for $5,and 9open tax liens for $149, Information regarding the specific natureand status of such derogatory public fillings was requested but never receivedby CulverIn lieu of providing such information, client has elected to cancelsuch financing requestPer the terms of the agreed proposal terms the clientwould then also be electing to forfeit their financing depositTo avoid such anoccurrence, Culver has been in contact with [redacted] LLC topursue possible acceptable alternatives